Fake for Gelos

[LCR]

Сообщение от Sim

If this is the text from the catalog, it is quite correct. In this formulation - the decision to purchase should be more meaningful. And is probably cheaper. Seems to me that the claim "bogus" just less correctly.

Can you tell me why the claim that the artist painting attributed nothing to do with this artist does not have, "not quite correct?
In your opinion, should be silent, to those who ascribes to the artists all sorts of rubbish, thereby discredits their good name, to wheel and their dealings with impunity?

Interesting you have ideas about what "correctly" and what does not.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Here is "assigned" and is indulgence for "Gelos". Correct was used to write - a picture of an unknown artist, ascribes ....

If only for "Gelos" ...