I easily introduced into the browser search for "control" word and got the link from the August 8, 2010:
http://blog.fontanka.ru/posts/42367/
And the information in it a certain Sergei Sorokin of past merits Rubinstein, on whose history you are referring to:
"Blokadnik Usherovich Leonid Rubinstein - not just a rogue with great experience, but also repeatedly convicted criminal.
He was convicted of:
A. 06/02/1969 Leningrad City Court on Article 78 (smuggling), 88 Part 2 (foreign currency transactions), 154 part 2 (speculation), the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 12 years imprisonment.
For that, he indicated the place where the convict was hiding, tried to escape, his "dropped" and he was being rushed to a zone in the area, where he was an informant.
Two. 21/03/1980 Vasioleostrovskim of Leningrad District Court under Art. 191-1 Part 2 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR to 6 years in prison for violence against a police officer in the performance of official duties.
Also, the story of gaining possession of Rubinstein LW room on the Moika Embankment was associated with the mysterious and unsolved death of her mistress.
Her violent death was not disclosed until now, although a version of her murder was just a person interested in purchasing her room on the documents that the victim has not signed or not signed in sane state (she was an alcoholic, that is the best "customers" rogues and criminals, hunted housing).
It was Leonid P. decorated the room then, and the victim would leave it to your child ...
It did not work ... ".
Here's a collector from St. Petersburg ... the fate of the complex.
Posted 23 minutes
The story of the gypsy Semenov, which is referred to here are somewhat higher in performance A.Ya.Hochinskogo sounds here:
http://www.compromat.ru/page_28570.htm
There is, as I wrote earlier, accompanied by the documents. Check out who is interested. Necessary to gain literacy in order to avoid unpleasant situations.
The first time an artist Gypsy Theater of Miniatures Nikolay Semenov has appeared in antique salon "La Boheme" in June 2004, the commission proposed a two paintings - supposedly Bryullov "Turk" and Shishkin, and Fedorov, "Brook in the pine forest." Carefully read the conditions specified in the contract of commission № 101 dated 29.06.2004 and signed in two places - at the bottom of the treaty itself, and after a special condition: "The parties agree that the company" La Boheme "at his own expense produce an expert to study, etc. . these 2 pictures. In the case of the sale value of these or other costs associated with the sale of pictures, taken on by LLC "La Boheme." If the commission principal (deliverer) at will decide to take a picture of the company "La Boheme", he is obliged to repay the expenses referred to. " As an artist Semenov complained that he was at that time have done something with the eyes, and did so, and therefore, he was well aware of its liability for incurred LLC "La Boheme" costs. [...]
In support of her claim that the picture painted by KPBryullov, citizen of the NI Semenov placed on us two documents, which, ostensibly, he personally received from the staff of the State Tretyakov Gallery and the All-Union Scientific Research Institute for the restoration of them. Academica I.Grabarya (copy enclosed), which later on the conclusion of law enforcement agencies were fake (see WTO ruling CCM Arbat district of 28.11.2006 on refusal to initiate criminal proceedings against the citizen at the Semenov NI - copy enclosed) .
Together with the employee Rosokhrankultura George Sytin and Head of Department for the Conservation of Cultural Property Rosohrankultury A.Vilkovym comparisons were made of the "Turk" with missing during the war, "Turk" from the Russian Museum and the "Creek in a pine forest," with a similar picture missing from Grozny Museum. I myself have brought these pictures to Rosokhrankultura and together we made sure that these pictures are not of the missing. (Yes, the lessons of his youth were not in vain!) I also spent a lot of work to study the authenticity of these paintings - in Moscow, there was not a specialist, which I would not show "Turkish woman", including Lyudmila Markina of the State Tretyakov Gallery, Natalya Ignatova from the Center them. I.Grabarya and others. The opinion was one - this picture was not painted by Charles Bryullov, but only an imitation of his manner. Given that I have not seen more prospects to sell "Turkish woman" whose authenticity "backed by" false examinations artist Semenova, I told him that he, as seen from the inscription on his fields commission contract number 101, took two pictures of the year 19/07/2004 . However, I did not take him for a single penny I spent a lot of work.
Pomayavshis with the sale of paintings and a half years and not finding suckers who could vtyuhat painting by an unknown artist, "Turk," whose authorship is confirmed fake examinations made on the copier, Semenov again turned to me for help in the sale. In this case, the proof of his position, he also applied a false mentioned examination in which a citizen Semenov, N. tried to introduce us and our customers in error - we sell a fake, or with our help, all of our clients trust us antique salon "La Boheme." I explained to him that he was the last way to verify the authenticity of the picture - it is to take her to the St. Petersburg Russian Museum for examination there. Timing - is the best place for such checks to the best specialists in the world for Karl Bryullov. As the actor immediately agreed Semenov, it passed into our antique gallery "La Boheme" at the commission under the commission contract № 213 of 18.02.2006, the [...] picture of the "Turk", oil on canvas, 66.5 x 79 cm without a signature, according to the consignor, authored by Charles Bryullov. Special conditions, as reflected in the Treaty Commission number 213 was the same as in the previous treaty number 101: "If the commissioner will pass a subject for expert investigation with the issuance of a written opinion, but The commission wants to take him to the sale, shall be obliged to pay the cost expenses of the commission to conduct examinations. In the case of sale of the commission, the cost of expertise is not retained. " Due to the importance of this provision is an agreement between the parties and to attract additional attention to this condition of the principal, under the given text The commission has put the extra signature. Thus, it is clear that a citizen NI Semenov well aware of its responsibility for implementing them, among other conditions of the contract, that this provision of the contract. In accordance with Art. 421 of the Civil Code: "Citizens and legal entities are free to enter into a contract ... the contract terms are determined at the discretion of the parties, except when the content of the relevant conditions prescribed by law or other legal acts." In accordance with Art. 309 of the Civil Code: "The obligations must be performed properly in accordance with the obligations and requirements of the law, other legal acts, in the absence of such conditions and requirements - in accordance with the customs of trade or other usually made requirements."
Then, later in the execution of the contract committee № 213 26.06.2006 we are, we have handed over a picture of the State Russian Museum [...] that the remaining "not traveled," the most authoritative national museum facility to determine whether this picture is real work to . P.Bryullova or, as it is set above the other expert institutions - no.
As follows from the conclusions of the Expert Timing (Ex. number 1862/4 on 28.06.2006), the resulting d 04/08/2006, (copy enclosed): "As a result of stylistic and technological research KPBryullov authorship is not supported ... The picture is variant copy of the eponymous unfinished painting KPBryullov from the Tretyakov Gallery. The picture was copied many times. "
All work for the timing on behalf of a citizen in NI Semenov this review we have been paid. We also incurred costs on arrival in St. Petersburg and the other (copy enclosed). Due to the important point - no proof of authorship KPBryullov - we decided to terminate the contractual relationship with the g-rated NI Semenov, they took a picture with the sale, in accordance with the contract of commission number 213, during his visit to our 8.5 .2006 year, told him personally about the need to take your property - now, after having paid the cost of the examination, the cost of storing pictures, our other expenses, and compensation (Article 310, paragraph 3 of Art. 424 and Art. 991 Civil Code) .
In accordance with Art. 310 of the Civil Code: "A unilateral refusal to perform the obligations associated with its parties of entrepreneurial activity, and a unilateral change in terms of such obligations shall also be permitted in cases stipulated by the contract, unless otherwise provided by law or the nature of the obligation."
In accordance with Art. 1004 of the Civil Code:
"1. The commission may not, unless otherwise provided in the contract of commission, refuse to follow it, except when the contract was concluded without an indication of its validity. In this case, the commissioner shall notify the principal of the termination of the contract no later than thirty days, unless a longer notice period is not provided by the contract. The commission shall adopt the measures necessary to safeguard the assets of the principal.
Two. The commission shall dispose of his commission under the responsibility of the property within fifteen days from receipt of notification of the refusal of the commission to perform the commission, the commission unless the agreement provides otherwise. If he does not fulfill this duty, the commission has the right to take property for storage by the principal or to sell it at the most remunerative for the price.
Three. If the commission contract provides otherwise, the commissioner, who refused to execute orders, reserves the right to commission for transactions concluded by him until termination of the contract, as well as reimbursement of expenses up to this point. "
On the order and the amount of levy with the principal payment for the storage of pictures in the event of termination of the Treaty Commission, it states: "This product may be removed by the decision of the parties. By decision of the commission goods can be withdrawn from sale, the principal shall be notified by telephone or otherwise, and shall collect the goods within five days. If the shot from the sale of the goods does not take away this time, he is obliged to pay the deposit removed from the sale of goods at a rate of 1%(one percent) of the price specified in the receipt, for each full or partial month of storage. "
The Treaty Commission - civil contract by which one party (the commission) shall, on behalf of another party (the principal) fee to perform one or more transactions on their behalf, but at the expense of the principal.
The commission is obliged to pay the commission fees for services rendered, unless the contract concluded between the parties does not meet this criterion, then the contract can not be called a contract of commission. In all other contracting parties are at their discretion. In this Part 2 st.991 Civil Code expressly states that: "If the commission agreement was not fulfilled due to reasons beyond the control of the principal, the commission reserves the right to commission, as well as reimbursement of expenses incurred." In accordance with paragraph 20 of "Rules of commission trade non-food products" (as amended on February 22, 2001): "The commission shall have the right to demand compensation for damages caused by the cancellation of the order. The commission shall within the period prescribed by the contract the commission, and if such period is not installed, located immediately to dispose of his property in the introduction of the commission. If the consignor fails to perform this duty, the commission may take the goods deposited by the principal or to sell it at the most remunerative for the price. " Article 420 of the Civil Code regulates the disposal of the property of the principal after the failure of the commission to execute the instruction: "The commission put in the popularity of the commission to refuse to perform the commission, shall, within one month from the date of receipt of failure to dispose of the property located at the commission. The same responsibility lies with the consignor in case of cancellation of his commission orders (Article 421). If the consignor within the specified period does not dispose of the property located at the commission, the commission may take such property in storage at the expense of the principal, or in order to meet their demands to the principal to sell the property to possibly more remunerative for the price. " This order is set, paragraph 3 of Article 1003 of the Civil Code: "In case of cancellation of orders shall be obliged within the period prescribed by the contract commission, as if no time is set, immediately dispose of his commission under the responsibility of the property. If the consignor fails to perform this duty, the commission has the right to take property for storage by the principal or to sell it at the most remunerative for the price. " The commission shall have the right to hold property of the principal until the fulfillment of the obligation to pay the principal fee for transactions made prior to termination of the contract and recover the costs incurred by the commission to cancel the order. This right is set out in paragraph 2 of Article 996 of the Civil Code: "The commission may, in accordance with Article 359 of this Code are to keep his things to be transferred to the principal or the person specified by the Principal, to secure their claims under the contract of commission." Such actions of the commission will be classified as a deduction, which is the one way of performance.
Due to the fact that a citizen NI Semenov did not make the payment, we sent him two telegrams 10/04/2006, and 06/05/2007, the [...] a reminder of his obligation to pay our expenses and the cost of storing pictures, starting with the year 11.08.2006. Also, the cables indicated that in the case of non-payment and zabiraniya paintings in 10 days we present to him a lawsuit. According to the available postal and telegraphic notices, telegrams were received, both personally NI Semenov In addition, the fact that the citizen of the NI Semenov was well aware of the potential of our legal actions, including a possible sale of its property, and speaks eloquently of the fact that he answered numerous and groundless statements and complaints to various law enforcement agencies.
In connection with the two-year failure by the Principal NI Semenov their responsibilities under the Treaty Commission number 213, we decided to exercise its legitimate right in accordance with Part 2 of Art. 1004 of the Civil Code and Section 20, "Rules of commission trade non-food items" to "sell the property to possibly more remunerative for the price." For this, we passed the 20/08/2007, the picture of the famous, a leading auction house, "Gallery Sovkom" [...], who published a large edition and distributed auction catalogs, and at a public auction number 41, was held 27.10.2007 sold it of 80,000 rubles (copy enclosed). Because the proceeds of LLC "Antique Gallery La Boheme" for the sale of the painting "Turk" amount does not cover the costs incurred by us relating to the execution of the contract of commission № 213 of 18.02.2006 g, we reserve the right to go to civil court to recover from the debtor of his debt.
08.05.2012, 03:51
Линейный вид
