The artist in the art market - the criteria for participation

[iside]

Сообщение от I-V; 1956441"

I'm afraid to go back to Lozhkin , but Cyril (and other friends ), when you refused to call it a " market participant ", you , as I understand now, saw it primarily as a seller? Why, then, one of the criteria for you to become characteristic of his work ?

IV, the artist should not be the seller 's interests must be someone . The quality of creativity in the art market is not considered, there are other goals and objectives. >
A, no one at all , buffoon , but a lot of these , they all want to be artists, and recently also members of the art market . >

[манна]

Сообщение от IV

I'm afraid to go back to Lozhkin , but Cyril (and other friends ), when you refused to call it a " market participant ", you , as I understand now, saw it primarily as a seller? Why, then, one of the criteria for you to become characteristic of his work ? <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

Сообщение от manna

I -V. read carefully

Modern art - it is also a system is rather rigid rules of etiquette , it is unclear from the side. For example : the artist does not have to sell their own work; to his show should be written in the text of a famous critic , and even better philosopher or politician , should work in an intellectual , but in any case not in an emotional way , . ...

Let this , a particular text is written with a certain degree of irony , much of the above can be written without it .....

[artcol]

Сообщение от manna

Let this, given the text is written with a certain degree of irony, much of the above can be written without .....

This text - and even test > If he wrote Tar ...
Well - well >

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от artcol; 1956141"

Seller - member of the art market . And the buyer . And the artist - he can not be a member of the art market. That is, market - a trade , and the artist - the manufacturer .

There is a problem ... Let me explain through an example. One paper wrote about the cultural values ​​of "property", not having used this definition - KC and further evaluated by referring to some standards ... It turned out that everything is wrong: because of the fact that KC is a special kind of property , it is subject to other methods of evaluation ... though it is also "property" ... Well, that's the situation with the market is like .... Yes, KC product ... but ...