Iksigon CHA: "The return of the black square" 10-22.01.2012

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1925021"

you kind of already said that you depressingly provincial ?

I looked at this here is your still life and I - " woefully provincial " have some questions.
Seriy, I see the edge of the bowls and cups with the same color as a stroke.
1. Why is it wrong?
2. Why are you inside of these things have the same black ?
3. Why is it necessary sharply "cut " the bottom corners of the composition ?
4. What is the " round orange" in the right part of the background ?

[iosif]

Seriy, in my opinion, you are a very good artist.
I though you and not found in the first parish, I would like something to take my house.
Remind them please, how much are apples and sad girl post above?

[Seriy]

When asked why, I did so and not otherwise, I often do not know what to say ... because I felt so, because that is the color and compositional logic. After all, as I mentioned, the picture for me is the equation, t e a logical problem which has the only right decision. Like me today why I was haunted, smeared in a still-life "Jug with Pears" edge glass? Answer: because it's better straight edge I break, and smearing - no.
Specifically, in this picture, by the way, my very popular movie to the web, t e it clicked the greatest number of users:
1. Do not understand the question.
2. Black square and black triangle is the Suprematist figures, they just do not float in space, and are tied to specific objects of still life.
3. Table on which there are items that will turn an angle to the viewer, we obtain two cut around the edges, this wedge gives the composition movement. If the table is flat, then the objects on it would be stupid static standing.
4. Orange ball can be anything-sun, breaking through the blinds, or a fireball, as it says in the title, orange. The aim of his soaring, and blind.
There's still a sort of yellow imprematura, m e is written on a yellow ground color, without a job can not remember, long ago.

aah .. You mean the black stroke subjects? so this is a classic post-modern technique called kluazonizm.

Added after 2 minutes
iosif, thanks, now I will answer in a personal, because on Tuesday I have the new prices.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1925151"

aaa .. You mean the black stroke subjects? so this is a classic post-modern technique called kluazonizm .

No, the blue edge of the bowls and cups.

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1925151"

black square and black triangle is the Suprematist figures, they just do not float in space, and are tied to specific objects of still life .

Y-yes, of course , "The Return of the black square ." >

[Seriy]

Cyril Syzran, that's right, a black square always returns!
:-)

sorry, I do not remember about a blue border, we must glance work, and it is in the CHA, but I'm home.
It may brush over.

[I-V]

Originally Posted by IV; 1924871"

even titanic amount of your work can then be quickly scatter for amateurs, but the price of yet more than available in an instant cease to be such

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1924931"

As for " smashed by collectors for large sums of money " - hardly ....

Originally Posted by iosif; 1925141"

Remind them please , how much are apples and sad girl post above ?

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1925151"

I Tuesday the new prices .

Seriy, I , in fact, this >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Seriy

sorry, I do not remember about the blue edge, we must work to look

And the snippet:

[Seriy]

Cyril Syzran, you mean just the thickness of the walls of the pitcher and cups?
They are rectangular in the slice, because it's cubism.
Why blue, more blue-turquoise?
just a color, it is leading in the picture.
So this is not fringe, but just cut the walls.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Seriy

Why is blue, more blue-turquoise?
just a color, it is leading in the picture.

Yeah I see.
 
"The leading color" "brush was so" ...
 
>

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Seriy; 1925151"

why I did so and not otherwise, I often do not know

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran ; 1925291"

Yeah I see

Cyril Syzran In this debate I understand the position Seriy and do not understand yours. Demand from the artist's mathematical explanation of lines and spots in the picture , it's strange .
You know what question I ask of artists working not in a realistic manner : - When they realize that the picture is finished ? After all, what is obtained does not coincide with the picture in my head , the hand often does something different . And in this situation, start talking about the theoretical background of the spot - is meaningless. It is solely my opinion.
And in this connection Seriy, a question for you (I'm still hoping to get to CHA tomorrow /next day and ask in person) and when you decide that the painting is ready ?