Larionov, right? The value of the painting?

[Ratatui]

http://www.director-info.ru/article....=13962&iid=626

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от herrmails; 1809313"

Clarify what books to read advise what kind of stuff to see , to begin to understand the paintings and at least at the basic level to understand its painter. value?

From the literature , I think it is early binding , but " material view " - ochent correctly .
We must look painting . And a good one. So - museums , museums and museums again .

[herrmails]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

We must look painting . And a good one.

In this direction, just move > Museums , museums ...

The question is what it is, "good ." Museum specimens , they are unique , they will not buy, and thousands of writers , not to mention how many styles of these authors.

Example: The picture is sold . Let this be Perevyshko A. " Russian Winter" which I discussed here on the forum.
Look man in the street , which is far from just art, says - " hmm .. daub , and a child can . "

The museum paintings, often of a top artist , delicately painted with the story , etc.

How to understand the " mazne " for example , Impressionism, the avant-garde ...
How do you know that , like " Boy with a Pipe " - is a masterpiece , and the other picture , writing in the same style , but little-known author - a cheap , useless picture . It 's not help the museums.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от herrmails; 1809413"

How do you know that , like " Boy with a Pipe " - is a masterpiece, and one painting , writing in the same style , but little-known author - a cheap , useless picture .

And what is there to understand - Just think, the binomial theorem ! ( c) >
The eyes see.

Сообщение от herrmails; 1809413"

It 's not help the museums.

Just that!

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от herrmails; 1809413"

Example: picture is sold . Let this be Perevyshko A. " Russian Winter" which I discussed here on the forum.
 

etude . [/URL]

Сообщение от herrmails; 1809413"

look at man in the street , which is far from just art, says - " hmm .. daub , and a child can ."

Yes and no such purchase , and they do not pay attention .

[mihailovoh]

herrmails,
Not on your raspylyatsya.opiratsya vkus.a it is or not?
If you like the work of a hundred of his works avtora.posmotrite in музеях.литературе.интернете - understand where the "masterpieces ." Where " ordinary" raboty.pochemu these were in the museum if you read all sobraniya.Horosho materially . comments. that would be available.
To understand the styles and trends of destiny art and " pro"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от mihailovoh

Understand the styles and trends of art and destiny "pros"

And this is absolutely not the point.

[herrmails]

Cyril Syzran,

Here's an example picture , the author - Mironov VS

What can you say about it? First and foremost painter. value?
On cultural values ​​of the information can be found on the Internet. That it attracts me in this picture, but the exact relationship of the artist in Russia, " wooden " town Borowski, attention to rural themes , etc.

Relatively thin. values ​​- not to say that I liked it at 100%.

Give your comments please .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от herrmails

The relatively thin.
values ​​- not to say that I liked it at 100%.

I also can not say that "I liked it at 100%," rather, it is 100%I do not like.
 
>

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от herrmails

please Give your comments.

And what is there to comment on that?

Mediocre landscape in haste + some running children burned in the foreground the artist added to ozhivlyazha.
>

[Алек Сандер]

Сообщение от herrmails

In this direction, just move > Museums, museums ...

......

How to understand the "mazne" for example, Impressionism, the avant-garde ...
How do you know that, like "Boy with a Pipe" - is a masterpiece, and the other picture, writing in the same style, but little-known author - a cheap, useless picture. It's not a museum to help.

Can I shall bring the mite? A more accurate advice? In addition to museums, galleries yet, albums and albums. Also, read about their favorite artists. And then watch the albums and then go to museums. And then read and albums. This is akin to, ahem, a gym. Thus you "pump" their aesthetic muscles. You learn to see. But this takes time. Right not "pumped". You look at the album, then set aside, then it will take some time, then you take it again - and probably will be surprised to see something not seen before. Especially in this help galleries to museums, because they contain different levels of performance and picture.

And in my opinion, it is best to apply this scheme to the end of the nineteenth - twentieth centuries. I'm not "see" by contemporary Russian artists. Absolutely. I can not. While it is impossible. But the train. > Peppershtein, Pushnitsky already saw. Mas, perhaps. But so, to see from the very beginning ... To do this takes years of training.

[herrmails]

Thanks to all for discussion and advice!