Required landscape - an exhibition in St. Petersburg and the presentation of the book

[artcol]

Сообщение от I-V

They are throwing !

Well , Make it clear ( about Mastisaa not sure ). And who of St. Petersburg ? Because there Repinka , and from it come the artists with another painter . vision ( and before that was generally so). Just wondering who Peter has popularized this style of his works .

[I-V]

The forum is a good topic - Leningrad school ( it would add ! ) .

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...BE%D0%BB%D0%B0

Сообщение от artcol; 1579761 "

And who of St. Petersburg ? Because there Repinka , and from it come the artists with another painter . vision ( and before that was generally the case) . Just wondering who Peter has popularized this style of his works .

Somehow, particularly persistently reminded of Vladimir Grinberg

[fabosch]

Сообщение от I-V

They are throwing !

Of course, they too were thrown .
A more circles from the " Circle of painters " , and you never know in Peter good traditions .
All artists have exhibited together , in extreme , as the fact that they are interested in painting itself , rather than the concept around it . As once we had such a small group that called itself " Bad artists . That is too ...
Some of these artists represented in my collection
Spread some more pictures . Now all laid out what was in my possession .
When I return from a trip home , and lay out the whole book . It is small - 32 bands , so who wants to - will be able to read .

[I-V]

Сообщение от "fabosch

When I come back from a trip home, and lay out the whole book.

That's thanks!
We will wait with impatience!

[fabosch]

Сообщение от artcol

Well , Make it clear ( about Mastisaa not sure ). And who of St. Petersburg ? Because there Repinka , and from it come the artists with another painter . vision ( and before that was generally so). Just wondering who Peter has popularized this style of his works .

Your post again saw late . Strangely enough, when he wrote his Your Message , your seemingly did not exist. Oh well .
Of Education is people from various streams , there Mucha , there Serov , there Gertsovnik , there are even two of Repinki ( Lintsbah and Rumyantsev ) is by gravity , the three learned on your drawing courses in Repinke .
And in general in St. Petersburg has always been strong , " krugovskie " tradition , as well as company Greenberg , Lapshin , Vedernikov , and Lebedev , detgizovskaya wonderful graphics and a whole company around it - here , too, where a strong school, and then there were school Sidlin , Arefevsky circle , big circle pupils , SD Levin , etc. Just the Moscow underground on hearing , and St. Petersburg , no less interesting , but little- known Peter .

[artcol]

Сообщение от fabosch

I saw your post again with a delay . Strangely enough, when he wrote his Your Message , your seemingly did not exist. Oh well .
Of Education is people from various streams , there Mucha , there Serov , there Gertsovnik , there are even two of Repinki ( Lintsbah and Rumyantsev ) is by gravity , the three learned on your drawing courses in Repinke .
And in general in St. Petersburg has always been strong , " krugovskie " tradition , as well as company Greenberg , Lapshin , Vedernikov , and Lebedev , detgizovskaya wonderful graphics and a whole company around it - here , too, where a strong school, and then there were school Sidlin , Arefevsky circle , big circle pupils , SD Levin , etc. Just the Moscow underground on hearing , and St. Petersburg , no less interesting , but little- known Peter .

Clearly , though not all .
I am now wondering : what is underground in the post - Soviet Russia ? Well, in the scoop is understandable , but now ? Artists not accepted in prof. community ? Or sociopaths ? Or something third ?

[I-V]

Сообщение от artcol

I am now wondering : what is underground in the post - Soviet Russia ?

As I understand it , to strategically investment basically is important to define precisely the issue. Frankly, it's almost the ground that should worry both the Forum and the site as a whole , in my opinion.

Thank you , artcol, that put such a question

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от IV; 1580511 "

Honestly , this is probably the main thing that should worry both the Forum and the site as a whole , in my opinion .

And why ?

Сообщение от IV

I understand that for strategic investments faithful principle is important to define precisely with this issue .

Why is it at all ? As an answer to the question artcol and " what is underground in the post -Soviet Russia ? " may affect /not affect the fidelity /wrong investment ?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Why not?

Why is it at all? As an answer to the question artcol and "what is underground in the post-Soviet Russia?" may affect /not affect the fidelity /wrong investment?
If it comes to that, the art created in the post-Soviet Russia? " More investment is too yunno /young, he is 20 years old, it is interesting for investment only, I believe, created by people, which took place earlier, once again in the Soviet period, in 60-70 years.
And much of this period in art raskazano /Much has been written there, in my opinion, all definitions are given, with all the issues "undecided".

If a new non-promoted (and I was interested in such) - in any case the question is not idle. But here I was more interested in the overall landscape. What is the meaning hidden in basements - if nobody rides?
Well, about the style. Stylistics common, constantly caught the eye of such works (Peter and GMT), but some tortured. I now hand does not rise to offer clientele such work, there is a suspicion that wasted time spent. But mb something I do not know, maybe it is the most cool, TB tsimus

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "artcol

But here I was more interested in the overall landscape.
What is the meaning hidden in basements - if nobody rides?

I have just about byo as a conversation with Sergei Chizh Chigrakovym.

He was so literally, and said: "And now there is no underground, hiding in basements do not have to."