Andrei Erofeev dismissed from the Tretyakov Gallery - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

LCR · 06.07.2008, 23:37

As a result of the case, it appears that the organizers of the exhibition, of which I spoke above, filed in court.
The exhibition called "The presumption of innocence", was devoted to childhood and took place in Bordeaux. The best part: looking at the exhibition, Mayor of Bordeaux, Alain Juppe, a hostile attitude to her. He refused to attend the opening day and forbade the Division of Culture Exhibition Hall to put posters in places designated by the municipal announcements. However, he secured funding for this exhibition.

The suit was filed by the Association, whose aim is bolba pedophilia, with the support of some Catholic circles, as well as parents of children who were taken without prior arrangement to watch this show.

I will not describe all the vicissitudes of this history, I will quote only one passage from an article written by supporters of the prima facie case, which I found in the Web magazine "The protection of Catholicism» ( http://spiritualite-chretienne.com/combat/index . html ):

«The lawsuit would never have been filed, if the museum remained a place where people go if they have the desire. However, it has become a sanctuary in the education of citizens, and there whole autocars being taken" captive "audience who can not abandon this tour - the elderly and children. /.../In the 8 th June and 1 st October 2000 70 lecturers have led to the exhibition "The presumption of innocence" 1500 children - from primary school to graduate. "

I bold what I think the center of the problem.

Constantine: since the question was about the exhibition "Forbidden Art", because the process of the exhibition "Caution, Religion" (the one that defeated the believers) have been, at least in the first instance, no?

Опции темы
Версия для печати Отправить по электронной почте
Опции просмотра
Линейный вид Комбинированный вид Древовидный вид

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Schilder Andrei	uriart	Costs, valuation, attribution	16	30.08.2008 09:06

06.07.2008, 23:37	Язык оригинала: Русский #11
LCR Гуру Регистрация: 29.04.2008 Адрес: Париж Сообщений: 6,211 Спасибо: 18,677 Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях Репутация: 29883	As a result of the case, it appears that the organizers of the exhibition, of which I spoke above, filed in court. The exhibition called "The presumption of innocence", was devoted to childhood and took place in Bordeaux. The best part: looking at the exhibition, Mayor of Bordeaux, Alain Juppe, a hostile attitude to her. He refused to attend the opening day and forbade the Division of Culture Exhibition Hall to put posters in places designated by the municipal announcements. However, he secured funding for this exhibition. The suit was filed by the Association, whose aim is bolba pedophilia, with the support of some Catholic circles, as well as parents of children who were taken without prior arrangement to watch this show. I will not describe all the vicissitudes of this history, I will quote only one passage from an article written by supporters of the prima facie case, which I found in the Web magazine "The protection of Catholicism» ( http://spiritualite-chretienne.com/combat/index . html ): «The lawsuit would never have been filed, if the museum remained a place where people go if they have the desire. However, it has become a sanctuary in the education of citizens, and there whole autocars being taken" captive "audience who can not abandon this tour - the elderly and children. /.../In the 8 th June and 1 st October 2000 70 lecturers have led to the exhibition "The presumption of innocence" 1500 children - from primary school to graduate. " I bold what I think the center of the problem. Constantine: since the question was about the exhibition "Forbidden Art", because the process of the exhibition "Caution, Religion" (the one that defeated the believers) have been, at least in the first instance, no?