Старый 05.07.2008, 19:04 Язык оригинала: Русский       #11
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Manual picture painted by the crowd all administrative transgressions of his former subordinate, hit the audience the endless details of museums, which, in their opinion, absolutely not cope Andrei Erofeev. Incriminated him that the department meeting time was not put on record, as well as conflicts with the artists, demanding his belongings from the museum collection on the grounds that they were not properly presented to the museum.
Well, time went so booze )))))))))))

Here I'll give 2 examples from my personal biography.

Preamble: The system works by storing the State Tretyakov Gallery of Modern Art, as far as I understood from the explanations of the staff consists of two completely noncommunicating vessels: one - it works, purchased or received as a gift to itself the State Tretyakov Gallery, and another - all that has brought a dowry of Andrei Erofeev.

Now the actual facts:

1. Not so long ago I was telephoned from Moscow, my friend. "You're mad, why have you taken away Yerofeeva work your husband?? Now he will be in big trouble, because he gave you work, not having the right to do and not filling out any documents! It took all my eloquence, that I recovered from stunned, convinced her that no work, I certainly did not pick up. Determined to find out the origin of such wonderful information, I called Andrew, who just do not know about it. Channel it has remained unidentified, but it can be concluded that "gross professional error Erofeev," which refers to the administration of GTG, were carefully prepared. That's right, but it's not all.

2. About a year ago I received a call from the State Tretyakov Gallery, and asked me if I had any documents evidencing the sale or donation to one of my husband's work, which is in the State Tretyakov Gallery and hung in the exhibition. They were absolutely necessary to have an acknowledged, as in this work they have absolutely no market. What's interesting: this depends on the container, nothing to do with not having Erofeev, so it seems, in the kingdom is not a crazy Danish prince.

As for work without ksivy, we have with them will still be talking about it. I understand: if they have no papers, hence, it is not them, but if it is not them, then it is mine, right?



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
 

Опции темы
Опции просмотра

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
Schilder Andrei uriart Costs, valuation, attribution 16 30.08.2008 09:06




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 16:57.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot