Phillips de Pury & Co sale Alexander Roitburd $ 40,000

[fabosch]

Originally Posted by iside

Well, I do not know, somehow unconvincing.

So I removed the screens with some paintings that were sold on October 26 in Dubai. All the artists are already dead, why exactly could not send a picture of yourself. Screens are all different in one general provenance is not populated and there are many, incidentally.

In addition to number 2 this was a picture of an Italian artist, live, at an auction in Italy and it is clearly written that it's from the gallery

I do not know what else to tell you about it. From your pictures I saw about a deceased artist says that obtained from the artist

[iside]

Originally Posted by fabosch

I do not know what else to tell you about it. From your pictures I saw about a deceased artist says that obtained from the artist

Something I completely ceased to understand "I do not idly interested, for me it is a very important question really.
Here's a screen No. 4, artist Fateh Mudarres (1922-1999), in line provenance: Private collection Rome, by whom acquired directly from the artist is from a private collection in Rome, was purchased directly from the artist, can not just be written to show that not one picture that is There are no brochures and catalogs with this work, no mention of it. As well as on this link Other work , for example, or here another case

Thank you fabosch

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by "iside

from a private collection in Rome, was purchased directly from the artist

Here is the private collector and passed the thing up for auction.

Not passed the gallery, and a private person.
Picture-why take the auction, she can sell, the gallery soon at auction buys.

[iside]

Cyril Syzransky, yes, I'm just trying to figure out what was meant purchased directly from the artist is
I think you purchased directly to those who passed the thing, not the artist himself had brought.
Yes?


And in the case of galleries, do not write or write from a picture.

[Seriy]

Cyril Syzransky, and, nevertheless, pass the gallery to the auction.
Same Barbarian Art.
Why not sell in Russia at the Art Moscow?
But no, pass to Phillips.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Seriy

gallery hand over to the auction.

Yes, pass.
When looking at growth rates during the bidding.
And for various other reasons.

Originally Posted by "Seriy

Why not sell in Russia at the Art Moscow?
But no, pass to Phillips.

And what Ari Moscow?
Mecca of the art trade, the global gathering of leading galleries?

[AlexandraL]

Originally Posted by Seriy

and there are going to sell millions of a handful of blue candies stacked in a corner.

And what you say, I'm a little understood, please explain

[LCR]

Originally Posted by iside

Cyril Syzransky, yes, I'm just trying to figure out what was meant purchased directly from the artist is I think you purchased directly to those who passed the thing, not the artist himself had brought. Yes?

And in the case of galleries, do not write or write from a picture.

So in fact there and it is written
Cyril is absolutely right in his time a private collector bought the work directly from the artist. Now this collector put it on sale through the auction house.

Such information is found in the directories of trades very often, it usually comes first, and then - a list of future re-sale, if any (in one of the above screenshots you it they are).

[iside]

Ur LCR on the forum!

[Seriy]

AlexandraL, I was about your perception of the mysteries of art.
Compared with blue candy Roitburd-Rubens.

Added after 2 minutes

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Galleries, why donate to the auction, she can sell, the gallery soon at auction buys.

Message from Seriy
"Gallery for rent for auction."

- Yes, pass. When looking at growth rates during the bidding. And for various other reasons.

Cyril, you yourself are at least sometimes? :-)