Rosokhrankultura abolished

[SergeiSK]

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has instructed the Minister of Culture Alexander Avdeev to prepare a draft presidential decree on the transfer functions of the Federal Service for Supervision of Law for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (Rosokhrankultura) directly to the Ministry of Culture. Writes today's "Kommersant".
The document was signed by the Minister on 29 July and is registered in the government on Aug. 2 under the number EP-P 44-5234 Resolution premiere: "I agree. Please make drafts of their acts in the RF Government in the prescribed manner. Time September 15, 2010.
As the newspaper notes, Rosokhrankultura was the sole executive authority, opposing the construction of 403-meter skyscraper "Ohta-Center in St. Petersburg.
Source in the quasi-quarters reported that, according to his information, the decision was made prior to the events around "Ohta-Center" and is associated with the verification of the Accounts Chamber.
(More details here: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1489103)
From the position of all parties to "Ohta-center" is more or less understand everything, but what effect the abolition of Rosokhrankultura in other spheres of culture and arts in Russia? I think no ... Do not protect it, and not reclaim "My attitude to this structure, a negative personal reasons.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by SergeiSK

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has instructed the Minister of Culture Alexander Avdeev to prepare a draft presidential decree on the transfer functions of the Federal Service for Supervision of Law for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (Rosokhrankultura) directly to the Ministry of Culture. Writes today's "Kommersant".
The document was signed by the Minister on 29 July and is registered in the government on Aug. 2 under the number EP-P 44-5234 Resolution premiere: "I agree. Please make drafts of their acts in the RF Government in the prescribed manner. Time September 15, 2010.
As the newspaper notes, Rosokhrankultura was the sole executive authority, opposing the construction of 403-meter skyscraper "Ohta-Center in St. Petersburg.
Source in the quasi-quarters reported that, according to his information, the decision was made prior to the events around "Ohta-Center" and is associated with the verification of the Accounts Chamber.
(More details here: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1489103)
From the position of all parties to "Ohta-center" is more or less understand everything, but what effect the abolition of Rosokhrankultura in other spheres of culture and arts in Russia? I think no ... Do not protect it, and not reclaim "My attitude to this structure, a negative personal reasons.

Blin, goats in the cabbage garden, no words ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by artcol

Damn, goats in the cabbage garden, no words ...

Do not rush you to the conclusions, there is nothing to the end is not clear. How, when? Maybe it just becomes agency division of the Ministry of Culture directly.
See.

Added 4 hours 14 minutes
18:20 18/08/2010
The Kremlin did not consider the elimination Rosokhrankultura.

MOSCOW, August 18 - RIA Novosti. The elimination Rosokhrankultura in the Kremlin administration was not considered, so no decision on this subject head of state was made, told RIA Novosti in the Presidential Administration.

On the possibility of abolishing Rosokhrankultura previously reported a number of media. Minister of Culture Alexander Avdeev allegedly was instructed to prepare a draft on the transfer of functions of departments directly to the Ministry.

Rosokhrankultura in its present form in operation since May 2008 when it was reorganized into the Federal Service for Supervision in Mass Communication and Protection of Cultural Heritage (Rossvyazokhrankultura).

http://www.rian.ru/culture/20100818/266577142.html

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzranskiy

Do not you hurry with the conclusions, there is nothing to the end is not clear. How, when? Maybe it just becomes agency division of the Ministry of Culture directly.
See.

Added 4 hours 14 minutes
18:20 18/08/2010
The Kremlin did not consider the question of the elimination Rosokhrankultura.

http://www.rian.ru/culture/20100818/266577142.html

Print them in any remake, paper printed with the new caps etc. E. Passed, it did not the first time rename. The main thing - do not know why it all needed?

[SergeiSK]

Continuing the theme:

Information about the imminent elimination of Rosokhrankultura first appeared in the paper "Kommersant" Culture is charged with protecting, "published in its issue of August 18. It, inter alia, stated that one reason for the closure of departments was checking the Chamber that shows very low efficiency. In formulating the reasons handover Rosokhrankultura Ministry in a letter to Vladimir Putin, Alexander Avdeev mentioned the need "to strengthen the organizational structure and staffing."
According to the Chamber, Rosokhrankultura controls only one percent of architectural monuments of federal significance, ie, 238 objects from more than 23 thousand of them - no one from the list of UNESCO World Heritage Site, but that is one of the main areas of service. In addition, auditors criticized the agency for work Licensing restorers: they have recorded more than half the people with permission to restoration activities of companies do not comply with the law, while Rosokhrankultura almost anyone to issue a license does not fail.
From unofficial sources in the power structures the same Kommersant learned that the verification of the Accounts Chamber may only be a pretext for the elimination of departments. For example, Rosokhrankultura oversees the programs of restoration and reconstruction, which allocated millions of rubles. If these functions will be transferred to the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry will monitor the work that the very same and orders. Also, in the second half of September Rosokhrankultura should take stock of the competition for the management of copyright and related rights. In this competition is solved, which organization will collect royalties from the use of protected works and contributions of these billions of rubles a year.

Читать дальше... 

more interesting (though hardly more important) thing, however, not these financial tag, and comment, this newspaper by a member of the Chamber. " when he came to the conclusion that the goals and objectives Rosokhrankultura unclear, but the service itself is physically unable to manage their territorial bodies, the Chamber raised the question to the Ministry of Culture for its liquidation", - he said. Quite unexpectedly.
So what actually are the "goals and objectives" Rosokhrankultura? According to the official website of the Federal Service for Supervision of Law for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (The full name of service), is the protection of cultural heritage, copyright and related rights, as well as the attendant control and supervisory measures and legal regulation. In addition, the office in charge of monitoring the import and export of cultural property, and the Chamber are convinced that this activity constitutes the bulk of Rosokhrankultura.
In Rosokhrankultura, headed by 34-year-old Alexander Kibovsky, disagreed. They argue that under the control of the service is more monuments than believes the Chamber, including 8 of the 13 objects from the list of UNESCO. In addition, staff Rosokhrankultura rightly notes that the claim for licensing restorers have become obsolete, because service is still pending the conclusion of the auditors asked the government to draft the abolition of this procedure.
In fact, Rosokhrankultura really protect those monuments that can. A striking example is the situation with the Museum-Estate "Arkhangelsk", for which the service is struggling for some time. Most of the land of the museum-estate (the total area of buffer zone is about 600 hectares) leased to private companies, and in the fight against illegal housing construction in the territory of the memorial service has dozens of lawsuits, some of which have already won. In addition, Rosokhrankultura, as the Ministry of Culture, opposes construction of the St. Petersburg skyscraper "Ohta-Center".
Success end, however, not all attempts agencies to combat the illegal exploitation of monuments. Thus, Rosokhrankultura failed to defend the territory of the Kazan Kremlin, which was built next to it houses the Ministry of Agriculture of Tatarstan will be put into operation. Similarly, the failure ended the fight for farm Shakhovskys in Moscow. Moreover, as recognized by the Kibovskogo, despite the work of service "monuments of cultural heritage in Russia are removed each day."
In the regions, by the way, Rosokhrankultura general practically devoid of tools of influence. Since 2006, the regional protection of monuments of federal importance to the regional supervisory organization, accountable to local authorities. The power agency Kibovskogo applies only to have to agree nomination of the manager responsible for the protection of monuments. Thus, a nominally correct actions and a set of functions Rosokhrankultura still remains a department that is actually a little on that may have an impact. Functioning within the Ministry, the service in general, performs the same function without having the appropriate resources.
Rosokhrankultura Originally conceived as a service whose primary function will be the protection of monuments; planned that its effectiveness will be provided only supervisory functions, not combined with economic, as it was before. Creating a department that had appeared recently - in 2004 - received a positive otlik as experts had hoped that now the preservation of monuments will be really someone to deal with. First Rosokhrankultura worked yet and the control of the media, and in 2007 added to the Office Rossvyaznadzor. However, such a merger was considered a failure, and the next year the Office was disbanded, and control over the media moved on to created at the same time Minkomsvyazi.
All of these transformations took place against a background of constant change legislation in the field of cultural heritage. Thus, Kibovsky, once headed Rosokhrankultura two years ago, confronted with the fact that the task set before the service is not always possible to meet due to the fact that this, paradoxically, prevents the law, as happened, for example, if the homestead Shukhov. It is noteworthy that one of the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the Rosokhrankultura Chamber is the fact that all the time of its existence, the Office was in the process of transformation.
In any case, while the information on the Abolition of Rosokhrankultura - is nothing more than a rumor. The papers say that Mr. Putin reportedly already signed a decree prepared by Avdeev, but officially it is not confirmed. Even if this is true, then the latter will be given to Dmitry Medvedev. Yesterday the Kremlin said that while the question of abolishing the Ministry of Culture under the jurisdiction of service has not been president.
If Rosokhrankultura still be abolished, the Ministry of Culture will be just one more or less independent agency - Rosarchiv. Once, in 2004, when the Ministry was reformed, there were four, including the addition Rosarkhiv and Rosokhrankultura Roskultura (abolished in 2008) and Rospechat (reassigned Minkomsvyazi in 2008). That is, after the movie, which was headed by Roskultura, the ministry will return and functions for the Protection of Monuments. In this context, one of the main issues that arise after the liquidation of security agencies, is, whether the political will to change the situation with Avdeeva monuments for the better. Maybe they at least will not disappear so quickly.
Alex Kadaner
(http://www.lenta.ru/articles/2010/08/19/rosohrancult/)

[Konstantin]

Obviously, the struggle against bulldogs under the carpet, smoke without fire.

[Любознательный]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

Apparently there is a struggle bulldogs under the carpet, smoke without fire.

Agreed.
Structural change will also change normativki (legal framework), ie will be revised mandate of the new structure. There is every reason to believe that this (together with other factors) and resulted in the elimination of Rosokhrankultura.
For us, the trouble is that when changing normativki will be reviewed and its licensing unit. Not in the direction of expansion.
Any restructuring would not be able to resolve the issue of protection of cultural heritage without strong direction for the purpose of budget funds or an exemption from taxation of individuals and organizations to preserve and develop culture.
Judging about the atrocities bailiffs (debtors, even domestic cats withdraw), the actual budgetary affairs in the country worse than could have been expected.
So I have no illusions at improving the protection of cultural heritage, with the declared defeat Rosokhrankultura.

[Allena]

Originally Posted by SergeiSK

what effect the abolition of Rosokhrankultura in other spheres of culture and arts in Russia? I think no ...

It recalls the immortal, not because they sat down! "
Imagine how funds will go out to implement this administrative decision? And time? Senseless permutation at a time when the cultural field of plow should not to give her a kick in the final.
It's boring all this, gentlemen!

[Евгений]

[Allena]