Volkov, Efim E.?

[redbor]

Honestly, I would never have thought that these pictures and
 "October 1883, Art. Siverskaya "drawn from the State Tretyakov Gallery, one artist.
Little in common.

[Игорь Гурьев]

I think this is a good freestyle copy.

In any case, your photos can not understand anything in particular.

That's true, a figure is, there are other differences, the trees are not "converted", as in your picture:

Вложение 822771

Your the same as dark as you have the photo?

[sergejnowo]

understand it, these works should be compared?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

understand it, these works should be compared?

Hard to believe that the left, you refer belongs Volkov - very helpless.

And right - well, how sweet!

[sergejnowo]

Igor Guriev, well, you and fastidious

And how do you this job?

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

and the right - well, what a darling!

My daughter recently attracted to photography.
I looked at the screen over his shoulder, on the job, and he says - well-focused picture though.
I say, option, let's discuss ...
Conclusion - "sharpness" is pointed at the first row of birch. Furthermore, from this plane, "sharpness" gently falls to the foreground and background.
But do not jump, gently ...
And the rear and fore presented with no particular loss of brightness of color, a simple conclusion - or a good photographer, a good lens .

If you consider giving to review the work at an angle above discussion, - the level many times lower.

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от redbor

Honestly, I would never have thought that these pictures and
 "October 1883, Art. Siverskaya "drawn from the State Tretyakov Gallery, one artist.
Little in common.

Honestly, I did not write
Volkov has written some 500 works. Most variations of several of his works. Eat like.
Zalezte in the network and see for yourself.

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I think this is a good freestyle copy.

In any case, your photos can not understand anything in particular.

That's true, a figure is, there are other differences, the trees are not "converted", as in your picture:


Your the same as dark as you have the photo?

My darker and much more.
Trees believed Volkov in its original form. Then distorted the term, cleaned (streamlined) fore, stuck to pity the old woman let a little house on the left (the viewer) the slope - and all at once let snot.
It was an autumn melancholy, became nostalgic for years.
Artist!
Present.
Able not only to change his plan in the variation, but also to reveal its spectacular facilities.

A version similar to my opinion, reached - just got into the network.

Added after 17 minutes

Сообщение от sergejnowo

If you consider giving to review the work at an angle above discussion, - the level at times below.

I agree with the lack of sharpness.
Pulled vein, staying home to be immobilized.
I begin to walk, stand it on the street and photograph well.
I am interested in the second picture. Volkov forever rewriting the same thing.
I've never seen anyone her?

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от inquisitive

Volkov wrote about 500 works. Most variations of several of his works.

how do you find such a variation ?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

how do you find such a variation?

And he left, too? Or is your work in Photoshop?

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And he left, too?

No, not him.
That's me to the fact that he could not be ascribed to work only on what is depicted.