Digital painting, prospects

[Roman Guro]

curious,

Computer killed the book.
Maybe kill paintings, graphics, and in 3D - and sculpture.
Perhaps.

Computer do not know how - this is just a tool.
It's like saying "Give me a good brush, and I become an artist"
Cinema revived image, 3D technology revived sculpture.
That's all.
To make a good 3D model, you must be a good sculptor.
The bad they can not do anything, the computer can help him.
To draw on the computer must be able to paint, to know the laws of perception, color, composition, anatomy, etc.
All the same way.
And even if your computer ever (so far, and hints at it not) learn to read your imagination, I'm afraid that postonennogo perception, you will still need all of this knowledge to convey his vision.
Otherwise there will be quality amateur photos.
Even now, beauty surrounds us everywhere.
The artist just throws away too much, and highlights important.

I liked your work, but I can not imagine them hanging in his apartment.
While not imagine.

Thank you.
This is no longer a question of technical performance)

Added after 25 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

Roman Guro, you talk about a new napravlenii.Na your opinion what is art different from the blundering (not in the sense of novelty technology performance), how to determine whether the work is a work of art? ( what you pay for something <!--~ a ~-->?

Without attempting to bring the truth of the wording of the encyclopedia.
She's quite accurate))

Art - figurative comprehension of reality, the process or result of expression of the inner world in an artistic way, a creative combination of elements in such a way that reflects the ideas, feelings or emotions.
Science and art - two ways of understanding the world.

From my own experience.
Skill convey feelings, emotions and feelings so that they understand the audience at the same emotional level.

In this sense, digital art course art, differing only instrument technique.

[NATA NOVA]

Roman Guro, I'm just going to throw off your инфу pro contests (etc.) kompyuernye ..
Of course, it is he art
In any case, many have already come across in a graphic competition (visual humor, bookplates) upminanie. that comp. Graphics also involved.
Threat: .. as well as the residence and grants (worldwide) ..

[Roman Guro]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Roman Guro, I'm just going to throw off your инфу about competitions (etc.) computer ..
Of course, this art
In any case, many have already come across in a graphic competition (visual humor, ex libris) reference. that comp. Graphics also involved.
Threat: .. as well as the residence and grants (worldwide )..

Nat, thanks of course)
But you somehow check my site under "about me"
For many, where he participated. I'm not empty-handed.

What is art, I understand.
And even have to confirm in the world.
There is more a matter of commercial expediency in our reality.
Because if the best butter, the butter too, and I can know how to write)
The material is crucial.

-
While such a picture emerges:

1. If you move the digital painting here, not alone, but form a line.
Something like "Association of digital artists.
Then there is a chance to run out on the course and an adequate assessment.
But it requires a serious investment of time and money, and does not guarantee the result.

2. Moving digital painting exclusively abroad.

3. Painting in oil.
Actually the easiest solution)

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Roman Guro

1. If you move the digital painting here, not alone, but form a line.
Something like "Association of digital artists.
Then there is a chance to run out on the course and an adequate assessment.
But it requires a serious investment of time and money, and does not guarantee the result.

2. Moving digital painting exclusively abroad.

 

You're absolutely right - this can be moved only in America, more precisely in the U.S.. But there are willing to pay millions of dollars for the injured Photoshop image. I hope that Europe had not matured yet.


In order not to pour back into a sieve, so similar theme:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=49561

[Posav]

That thought, that there are issues about the uniqueness of the product, ie not visible hand touch, it is not clear what to do with the notion of "original" if all these pixels are copied. Smears not skopiruesh. There is also the problem of authorship. Since this pixel, then how to prove that they're yours? Since there is no unique identity, then this work can be done by anyone and anyone named by the author. I recently read that Dubosarsky Vinogradov and the kitchen boy sitting at the computer and makes erections Tipo tolerate other heads on the classic work, then they will increase, podmazhut and will be their job, but they at least increase the matter themselves and podmazhut.

[Marta]

I think that theoretically could now be what you want art, including digital. If you print on canvas, but to disperse the meter for two or three, still think of something, like bring: perhaps some glaze or varnish, then why not. Besides the millions it will not do - the world go Another thing - the issue of sales and the issue price. And where they do not, these issues? And still - digital art "under the oil" makes no sense to do. More logical to write butter and print posters. Still, if you do digital art, then it must be something - well, a digital <!--~ a ~-->. Anything else does not like.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Posav

Here is thought that there are issues about the uniqueness of the product, ie not visible hand touch, it is not clear what to do with the notion of "original" if all these pixels are copied. Smears not skopiruesh.

But it really is!
You look at a picture in picture abstraktsionistkom style, and do not understand what all the so admired? For example, Rothko and Pollock (specify that the first I do not like totally).

A look at the reality - the colors a little, not a riot of colors, composition no, no story too! But you can scrutinize the texture of the canvas, skillfully made by the artist!
Try to convey the texture pixel ....

[Roman Guro]

Posav,

There is also a problem with the author. Since this pixel, then how to prove that they're yours? Since there is no unique identity, then this work can be done by anyone and anyone named by the author.

Individual letters IS. After all, his hands drawn
Just as in real.
Here, for example fragments closer:

Вложение 778931Вложение 778941
There is a smear, stroke, etc.
Textures do not smear, it is less sure.

As for proof of authorship, you are right. If legally, then the best proof of authorship is the possession of the file is original. The proof is on the level of peer review is also possible, but difficult

[Marta]

Someday, when digital art to implement and will settle thoroughly, something will come up with proof of authorship. Some sort of registration of copyright. But then again - under the oil, linocut, etching and other work does not make sense. Looking for something unusual.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Marta

Someday, when digital art to implement and will settle thoroughly, something will come up with proof of authorship. Some sort of registration of copyright.

Copyright - no problem.
The problem is interesting for investment - the ability to bulk copy the product digital design. Look at old photos or posters were at one time lottery products. And often worthless, especially propaganda posters. Nobody is stored, not the bank. Gradually, from one million up to now have lived only thousands and hundreds of copies, coordinates bear the imprint of time. Original lost. Layout lost. File the original did not exist.

And now a digital file is.