OSTROUMOVA? Watercolor

[kornilyev]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, this is something izvestnyya veschi.
And you want to say that you are imeetstso?

Everything listed is in stock! and not by some one. So if there is interest and offers ...

Prints From there all of http://kornilyev.ru/php/estamp.php

[U_Z]

Сообщение от kornilyev

Of Prints are all from

An unknown number 4 - A. Dürer, but a late impression, I think.

Added after 6 minutes

Сообщение от SergeiSK

Prices for its woodcuts vary. What is "fresh" auction, the lower the price

Were simultaneously and later play these works in the Soviet era, such as reduced size, for the album, etc. These prices are to copyright imprint, I think.

[kornilyev]

Many thanks for additions and clarifications. Adjusted information. And emerged a few more questions that I would like to ask with your permission.

An unknown number 4 - A. Dürer, but a late mark.

And how to determine how late? And some years those that were produced before?

Pavlov no initials - perhaps Nikolay Aleksandrovich (* 1899, St. Petersburg - † 1968, Leningrad).

In this comment a special thank you, very long time to find. Works good.

Somov - "helping to define what is it?" Character - a AA unit.

C Block is understandable, I would like to know what it represents an original from which this reproduction was made. Oil on canvas? The painting in the Tretyakov Gallery?

And one more question. Theoretically, better to sell at a paper author or a whole collection (consisting of 3-5 papers)?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от kornilyev

oil on canvas? The painting in the Tretyakov Gallery?

No.
 B. Count., Colored car. Gouache.
38 X 30.
1907.
GTG.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от U_Z

Unknown № 4 - A. Dürer, but a late impression, it seems.

Сообщение от kornilyev

And how to determine how much later? And what years those that were produced before?

This is - no etching and woodblock (woodcut). From "Apocalypse" is called "Vision of the seven candlesticks. If the original - that he was about 1497-98.

With regard to dating. Durer engravings printed from its inception to the present, almost without interruption. Only after 1880 do not have prints from Durer boards, and the method heliogravire (photogravure). In addition, they strongly copied and forged other artists, even a fairly well-known (eg, Marcantonio Raimondi). In order to distinguish the original from a copy, you must have a second copy prints - notorious original - and compare them with each other (best in stereoscope). For the dating of the first - look at the overall condition. Intravital original and should look at 500 years, even if it perfectly preserved. Secondly, look at the watermarks are there and what they are. Strictly speaking, the watermark - this is a whole science, and to present it here is impossible. But if you'd find (the Internet) such signs on the originals of Dürer, then the chance that you have the original increases. Paper should be hand-made. If you have seen in lumen "Helios", it is one of the first heliogravire 1880.

In general, only reproductions to date, I believe, is impossible: an engraving must hold in your hand, view, and only then determine the direction in which to conduct the study.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от U_Z

Unknown № 4 - A. Dürer, but a late impression, it seems.

Given the small size of the photo and a quick review of works, saw no watermarks, paper texture characteristic of hand-made. That's why ... "later mark, it seems.

Added after 9 minutes

Сообщение от kornilyev

Of Prints have all

See link http://kornilyev.ru/php/estamp/leniniana.php

Three recent works: Tukhachevsky, Frunze, Lunacharsky