Project Oksana Mach "Helium-3"

[NATA NOVA]

gans, thankyou for the link! (All falling into place) ..
As for the "no confidence" (or whatever else you specify), it is quite normal interest (especially when around stoko examples and bluff, and false advertising), would understand ..
Now everything is clear (what's what). O. Mach itself concretely. constructive, clear and well everlasting reasons .. What is not clear why it is accented reporters ... .. matter of some perplexity (Especially. When confronted with real innovation)
In any case, thanks for the links. Interesting. (I wonder privleatelnaya person)
And yet, I patent numbers are interesting too .. (Academic) interest, you understand ...)

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

Added after 2 minutes
gans, you would be better instead of insults resulted certificate number and a description of the subject invention is an open data. It is your job as a journalist. Unable to "- look in the wiki word" lazy "and" incompetence.
__________________

Yes, gans, in fact, why are you so?

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от Berth

and lacquer miniature, finally?

wharf, a very good question! deserves a separate topic.

Added after 10 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

what is certainly no room regsvidetelstva,

I also have great doubts, because normally receive certificates of authorship it quite troublesome ..

[gans]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

in fact, why did you so?

Why should I? Yes, I'm writing something, like for normal people, and in return get some nonsense about the number of certificates.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от gans

some nonsense about the number of certificates.

gans, dear, well, how can a personal interest include "delirium"?
It's not very nice ..
Something I do not understand .. I am very interested .. (What, already, and ask not?)

[Seriy]

NATA NOVA, and in light of the topic it becomes clear one of the motives of promotion of artists through auctions. Here LCR arithmetically, we clearly demonstrated that it is unprofitable, contrary to common sense - more expenses than income.
And people still do it. And you can guess why. Do you have, for example 200 paintings Ixygon. Specifically, 212 Artworks (USD 32,266.00) to assess the author, the average price of about $ 150 you spend a little effort on the exhibition, then, behold, including taking part in auctions and Nesco works sold for $ 1500 This means that the confirmation assessment of the collection is 320 thousand dollars and if Nesco works sold for 15 thousand dollars which means that you have a paper to assess the collection of 3 million 200 thousand dollars calmly go to the bank and get a loan secured by 1.5 million paintings U.S. begins a completely different life :-)
 And where respected LCR c her talent to the calculations?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy

NATA NOVA, and in light of the topic it becomes clear one of the motives of promotion of artists through auctions. Here LCR arithmetically, we clearly demonstrated that it is unprofitable, contrary to common sense - more expenses than income.
And people still do it. And you can guess why. Do you have, for example 200 paintings Ixygon. Specifically, 212 Artworks (USD 32,266.00) to assess the author, the average price of about $ 150 you spend a little effort on the exhibition, then, behold, including taking part in auctions and Nesco works sold for $ 1500 This means that the confirmation assessment of the collection is 320 thousand dollars and if Nesco works sold for 15 thousand dollars which means that you have a paper to assess the collection of 3 million 200 thousand dollars calmly go to the bank and get a loan secured by 1.5 million paintings U.S. begins a completely different life :-)
And where respected LCR c her talent to the calculations?

Somewhere (in the subconscious) gleamed such ... No, not thoughts, rather a sense ..
Thank you for giving them a clearer form. ;-)

... A panel "Virgin"-great! (IMHO)

[Seriy]

NATA NOVA, partly skips this topic in the news when talking about the U.S. gallerist who have taken huge loans from banks under the collection sovriska.
The mechanism is the same, only the appetites of others, because of the 1.5 million one will not mess around.
More precisely, there is even took out a loan under the picture, they do not belong, that's what!

Added after 2 minutes
Cyril Syzranskiy, a lot of variants, the difference between the loan to Western banks and deposits in ukrbanke-10 percent. From 1.5 million is 150 thousand dollars in annual revenue. You can live very even myself in anything not limiting.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy

Quietly go to the bank and get a loan against collateral paintings on 1.5 million dollars and started a completely different life :-)

And give it back?
Do not, Let them take pictures of the bank as collateral?
I do not know, I did not take the loan once, I do not know where this technology ...