Collectors

[Деко]

Сообщение от Romario

Of course, they parted with two or three less powerful things for the sake of a stronger, but this collection was created from the ground bit by bit without funding _IZ VNE_. The fact that they were selling something for the sake of buying the more powerful things with time, I certainly do not argue, but is not being bought on the shoulders sable fur coats, cars and people in gorazhi they were rich only in his collection. But, my dear uriart, I hope, there is clearly visible difference between this collection and collections of Abramovich, Vekselberg and the owner of a network of pharmacies. Therefore, it is in the Russian Museum.

Added after 3 minutes


Sovereshenno true, but not only during the war. After the war, a very long time people had, excuse me, nothing to eat for very long. Just before the 70th period.

The question is debating whether they were rich or poor. Rockefeller also was not being consumed in fur coats and cars. In general, he went on foot, because the petrol expensive. From the memoirs of his daughter - she remembered that everyone was talking about their bessmetnyh riches, and she never saw any cash or checks, or expensive clothes or jewelry - nothing. Asceticism was terrible. Slept on kkih some iron beds.
I think it would be correct to say that they are all rich, only one preferred to prosper in his - that the Rockefeller Foundation plant, then for the collector - a picture. And the same passion, and the same forward movement.
On the same basis we can and Rockefeller to name the poor - the benefits of civilization, he did not enjoy, he lived accumulation kapitalla.