"Conversations about the beautiful" in the gallery " 'Eritazh"

[Vladimir]

Yesterday was at the second evening Talks series of the beautiful "in the gallery" 'Eritazh »(http://www.heritage-gallery.ru/news/...f5d9fb7c4f3964) This is tea with the main thematic statement and subsequent informal discussions. Probably something close to the speaker, but in a comfortable environment.
Following the sojourn in unusual magnanimity for yourself
Vela Inna Solomonovna Solovyov ( "From a mother of beauty" on the radio "Silver rain"). Subject - Kandinsky. In the first part appeared Andrei Tolstoy, author of one of the reference books on the Russian diaspora "Artists of the Russian emigration» (http://www.bolero.ru/index.php?level...?& cat = 0). A person with teaching experience, and therefore described the "front work" intelligibly. Inna Solomonovna Solovyov, талантище also no words - keep the audience perfectly. Son of ex-TV presenter, apparently a copy. A woman with progressive views: Baroque egg Jeff Koons at Gagosian Gallery is not something that is not cursed, and even praised him

Читать дальше... 

, including through technological excellence. Approaching Kandinsky entered into a clearing of modern art. Why? There interesting. I thought that Kandinsky's difficult to discuss. What they argue about? With the right abstraction to exist? Or a point on the plane? All the theorems Kandinsky long turned into axioms, prove nothing. It remains once povostorgatsya, but because you want to argue, "Mauser get"
Amused incident illumination Kandinsky - how he came to abstraction. It turns out that the artist returned to his studio and saw the "incomprehensible" now, which erased figurative component. It turned out that it is his own work (not an abstract, and "specific"), but simply upside down. Like Newton's apple and sleep Mendeleev.
Made an interesting observation. Admiring oils in the gallery, look at the picture from a distance meter - the texture of the canvas, brush strokes glitter. I think that's as good as painting does not spoil, putting it under glass. Am about to go and see a corner of my eye, that somewhere flashed. Is back - and the picture-it's still under the glass. But the technology is wonderful, delicate museum glass, which prevents distortion and super-duper antiblik (backlight shines steadily, and almost did not give a reflection). It is amazing to what level of technology reached. Older "glassing" a very bad effect on the perception of painting. I remember the exhibition Krasnopevtsev - masterpieces (in my opinion, from the collection Semenikhin), but sheltered glass - a nightmare. Think not about painting, especially the outlook owners.
More impressions: 1. selection Lansky on the walls, each other beautiful. 2. drink superekzoticheskoy variety of white tea Ahmad. They said that Moscow had brought from London, while only one packet, and deliveries will start only next year ... Maybe by this magnanimity?
P.S. To quickly bring to their senses after the art-talk - art-car Moscow metro. I went - on the walls of watercolors Sergei Andriyaka. More precisely, there, at the side of the car where the seats should be for passengers, hang reproductions of watercolors Andriyaka. And there are no windows. Instead of them - reproductions of watercolors Andriyaka. In short, neither sit nor orient - a museum, a pancake, on wheels