In memory of Gayane Tiflis

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от heir

Cyril Syzransky, explain in your own words what you so called out, Explain, plz.

For me this is already done.
Read this to start:

K. M. Zdanevich.
  Niko Pirosmanashvili. -M. 1964.
E. Kuznetsov . Pirosmani. -M. 1975.
Niko Pirosmanishvili (1862-1918) /Catalog of the exhibition. M., 1986. - 82 pp. ( with TE Sanikidze, NV Apchinskoy and DV Sarabyanovym ).
R. E. Kandelaki. artist wandered around the city. - Moscow: Det. lit., 1979. - 254 pp.: Ill.
Xenia Bohemian. Niko Pirosmani. - M.: White City, 2002. - 47.: Ill.

Сообщение от heir

If you can tell, the genius?

This is interesting, if just from all-all different.

Сообщение от heir

Square Narus - a genius?

You-not, Malevich-yes.

Сообщение от heir

so I Savrasov with Repin not confuse ... dubious advantage for a class, the more so as you write, even a genius artist.

I have visibility to the "dubious merit" does not ascribe.
And, incidentally, neither Savrasov, no Repin great artist does not think so. And tell them not difficult, you are right, one landscape, and the other haulers and the Cossacks.
: D: D: D