Art Moscow 13

[K-Maler]

Originally Posted by Vladimir

Target to be honest. For example: you get is not an investment asset with reasonable risk and predictability, and a prestigious consumer goods, which is intended to emphasize your status and deliver aesthetic pleasure.

Wrong is separated. In art, everything is possible, if it is art. You are trying to introduce the term "prestige, status, defining it as a negative, like crafts ... Bouquets Van Huysum, for example, were very prestigious, especially against the "ideological" religious paintings of those times. But they were and are "within art." Now the same thing, no "commercial art" is art or not art. But art has always been a status and commercial, it was always someone else paid. Investing should be in the industry, and to understand the details (the art of it or not) at the seminar can not teach.