Razyskivayu of Mikhail Roginsky

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Glasha, of, you guessed it move, and I rubbed her. : eek:
Nothing now navayaem "netlenku" ...
(always have to remember who the "author" theme. Forswear after writing in topics in this party, but no, in the heat of polemic sometimes forget about the "hygiene ".)

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 11 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Pavel

With Roginskii everything easier, here the net spin and swelling. He is an artist of the Moscow school today with all its kolloristicheskimi ailments.

As one wise man: Roginskii refutes the theory of the omnipotence of PR, as part of people's lives without him.

I am in a remote message advised Pavel have to listen to the opinion of colleagues on Roginsky.
After all, ask any Maitre and, as if he personally did not belong to his painting, get an answer, he is an honest painting.
Do you need a painting of some PR?
Even something as ridiculous a question to ask.
Already critics red door * placed next to the black square on the value of Russian art.
Already it is clear that about Moscow 60-90 years. people in 20 years had to be judged by the pictures Roginsky, as the Paris end of the 19 th century. judged by the paintings of Pissarro and beg. 20 th of Marche.
Already and forget about the Soviet Union, about Soviet life, but will simply look at the windows "Khrushchev, on figures of people at bus stops.
What is it PR? Not the scale of personality and creativity.
Creative Roginsky feat comparable to the feat of Van Gogh.
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

*" However, when I was erofeevskaya exhibition, I was sitting under this "door", is kind of a simple woman and says: "And how is this horror?" I said: "This horror called "Red Door". And he thought: "Christmas Tree, how many times a day it opens and closes the door?" Why is it terrible? So until now and do not understand. "
Roginskaya. From the interview of Vladimir Levashov.