The question of the primacy of the expert

[Ignat]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

Ignat,
I think it will help, and tell all prices.
And. I think that the expertise now need to give yourself, and not through the gallery owners.

Thank you very much, Sergey.
The only wanted to clarify, why not through the gallery owners? I thought so correctly, they are also interested in selling?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 16 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Ignat, for flood sorry, come out of the topic, their answers can I remove.
And.
I have this message too, will remove later,

Damn. I always thought that more or less speak speech. But do not stop. I even now I do not understand any of your previous posts, nor the meaning of this last phrase - you continue Stebaev? In my opinion, somewhat clumsily to mockery. For nesteba mysteriously. Questions have been something simple.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

but I will tell you, nobody pottverdit S. authorship of your pictures. In St. Petersburg, and asked why Moscow did not have to do? And all ...

Opinions are divided ...
Reframe the question: a crucial role in the attribution of plays technical espertiza (if any exist in the appropriate form) or opinions of experts?
And as far as the opinion of leading experts determines the judgments others?

If the attribution tightly paired with the opinion of two or three people, though very competent, but not with objective data, bad business - for market participants, primarily.