Jeff Koons in the Garage. Star without a "star"

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Do what you want, without regard to what this will say in polite company.

Quite possibly: infrastructure operators Sovrem. art does not have pretensions to be called polite society - they claim only to power.

Сообщение от Vladimir

If an artist does not need a viewer does not need the feedback, it can be. But this is strange. One of the advantages of the acquisition of the Modern Art - the chance to direct dialogue with the artist. If he "stepped aside" or two words can not bind (see interviews with many young), it is reason to doubt the intellectual work done. Even if вешь turned out beautiful.
For example, in the integrity of the technical realization of artistic conception.

In the basic structure of modern art complete communication between a party representing the artist and a party acting as the viewer is not provided, it is only a figure of speech. As to the fiction of a dialogue of the artist and the viewer:

Сообщение от Art-lover

us ... internal logic of the process functions allocated virtual crowd, whose applause, whistling and stamping their feet to the scene did not hear

Art would be doing mathematics, if the intellectual work was decisive in creating the image. What I saw at Koons "live" - Center Pinchuk, and the photographs - no pin. (Hurst, for example, looks stronger). If we assume here the existence of "the integrity of the technical implementation of artistic conception, one has to note the weakness of the artistic concept.
Could be assumed in advance for Koons in his bosom some fresh concept - which he could bring to an occasion dedicated as a mandate. I understand that Koons was not present at the conference shook originality of thought? His explanation about the inflatable toys were clearly addressed to potential consumers of these works - the white dandelions.