"Meeting .." Need help in the evaluation of paintings

[Jane Doe]

Oldmaps, what would you now have not been contacted, it does not raise the importance and value of your pictures. Yes, Jean Hay wrote the original, but it was in the late 1400's. The one who stole the story, peremaleval all the mirror, cut and rearranged the figures may not even know the history of illustrated story and its meaning. And it happened with your compilation of 450-500 years later. I do not think that the compiler wrote this painting from life, being in the London art gallery, which has existed since 1823 and the main collection was assembled in the 19th century. He would simply not allowed to do it. And he wrote this story is likely to reproduce. And with color. And when color reproductions began to emerge into the light? That's it.

Plagiarism is never encouraged. And no matter what the explanation, this picture will never be neither original nor a copy of the picture Hay, it's just a compilation.

Сообщение от Oldmaps; 2713161"

at exhibiting this painting in the Russian auction will indicate the attribution of "imitation of Jean Hay"? or the picture falls into another category? (What?)

On the Russian auctions is desirable to see Russian art and invest their money in it, and thereby to develop it.
And if not Russian, but at least with the author's signature and investment perspective. Why visitor Russian auction must buy your picture-compilation created is not known by whom, when and for what. (although it's obvious why).