Pyotr Konchalovsky

[LCR]

Сообщение от OlgaV

portrait naisanny artist who belongs to - the artist or the model?
In terms of copyright - the artist and his heirs.
From the point of view, vyskazannnoy in this forum - the right to now be owned model, ie Pebbles. But vzmozhno only if the portrait was presented to her by the artist, ie officially, with a dedication.

In addition, interesting opinions uchastnnikov, and the more the heirs on:
WHO should belong PORTRAIT: Artist or model?

As you yourself write, in terms of copyright portrait, painted by the artist, belongs to him and his heirs.

In the event that we are interested, I relied on the following facts:

- This portrait was in the apartment Benedikt;
- He was seized with the confiscation of property Benedikt.

From this I concluded that he belonged Benediktov, ie was either purchased or donated - the author or someone else.

I admit that the portrait actually belonged Konchalovsky and was at Benedikt's temporary storage, and that they demanded his return, but then they must necessarily be supporting this document, no?