Mark Rothko

[zarajara]

Сообщение от artcol

Zara , thank you for the answer, it is quite academic , like as not to argue about, if only on terms.

Do I understand you that modern art - it is no longer a plastic and has become a textual ? And all these arguments about Rothko just navsego consequence of this lack of understanding ?

Or are all the same " brilliant stroke "?

This refers not only Rothko and not just pictures.
I think that with the term itself Art need to understand in relation to the new realities. But while the use of the fact that there is. I now really like the term "cultural communication", he once more to determine and separate from the art such actionism , performance , and possibly black square and objects Duchamp etc.
That does not mean elimination of some important facilities of the category values. Simply time infinitely extended beyond the term Art something more concrete, or we can not use it because of the endless disputes. In fact, no longer can.

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

Because of the Soviet Union, Russia has been disconnected from the world process , and now, when all of humanity flooded the turned on us , our backwardness became apparent. In the U.S. abstraction accept and understand a lot of people , not necessarily very sophisticated, there is simply an abstraction - it's the natural course of history, what their grandfathers during the Second World War and after :-)

Many of these are visible only at the shows , and the average citizen like kitsch with swans, as elsewhere.
But you can take comfort . they do not understand the fervor of our social realism , and the pathos of underground protest also not understand.
Then do not forget that they often just polite. you show them a picture in the gallery , they smile and nod and you feel like you got it. Our ( your) immediately begin to discuss in terms of non-parliamentary .