Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Kirill Syzran; 2112861"
privatized Christ.
|
Well, it wants to do, of course. Apt statement.
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Kirill Syzran; 2112861"
Oh, it's good formula - it can successfully evade uncomfortable questions.
|
and a good formula and the correct guess. Your question does not matter <! - 6 ~ ~ ->
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от Kirill Syzran; 2112861"
Now I've put an excerpt from "preaching" another priest, and asked you about his "normality."
I now see a pop spitting in the face of the man who brought to his city exhibition of works of art and the second - the author of the above words.
You asked a question.
Now this is my question to you is clear? Logical chain catch?
|
Look, you get two pop ... right, well, not adequate (it will be correct to say) and here's another here priplyusuem let the patriarch (his apartment and he was a monk, and a gold watch
bread, the tobacco business was earlier) has anyone ... Well, let's Chaplin priplyusuem he did not think to take offense. He is only going to benefit. Here are ... There are still controversial clergymen, priests or parishioners? Frolov I do not include it in the list of sectarian and provocateur, the list can not enter. I think that there are still many Orthodox priests can write for example homosexuals, glutton. Many say, do not argue, but not
all. But you (I thought maybe imagined) of all, all, one size fits all is a weak mind, Goons, boors well, etc. And that is ... right? This is my question.