Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Artists, artworks, art history
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Artists, artworks, art history Discuss artists, their lives and works, the history of works’ creation and other art history issues.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 07.09.2011, 17:46 Язык оригинала: Русский       #11
Гуру
 
Аватар для Seriy
 
Регистрация: 26.03.2009
Адрес: Москва-Киев
Сообщений: 7,078
Спасибо: 4,985
Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях
Репутация: 12970
По умолчанию

Paul, I need not burden your search. My-it or do you have it or you do not, do not need to look for. It is only necessary to improve the language of expression, m e to give "their" buy decent shape. And the story of Van Gogh, clearest evidence of this. This we believe it is a revolutionary innovator, but he considered himself a conscientious student of Millet, Delacroix, Monticelli, Mantegna, etc.
You know that one day he suddenly changed its format from 90h70-switched to 50x100. The reason? Internal illumination in search of her?
No. He saw a picture of a Puvis de Chavannes "Inter artes et naturam" created for the opening of the building, a canvas in the format 1:2.
Van Gogh wrote about how to write and what size! T e from that moment it just goes to 50x100, begins to imitate Puvisu (?) Including a color solutions, as he imitated at one time Gauguin and some others. I believe that copying of Millet, he honestly tried to understand the secret of success. It turned out, mostly horror. Two good, the rest were terrified - he lost his color, shape .. Because, perhaps, the plots are close to Mille Van Gogh from a religious point of view, but not with the beautiful? You say, Cezanne, the Impressionists, but no copies of Van Gogh, for example, Monet! though he knew it. A copy Millet had dozens! T e is not that the Impressionists and Van Gogh's Millet's teacher?
T e as a Van Gogh or tried to follow the examples of successful artists, he has turned out as always, its all I have to score. The style that we see, was obtained in spite of his efforts.
The question was not in search of self, the question was, whether it is his ego to society. The time has come, was necessary.

 The method of Van Gogh-run, with his pants at others liked the idea of ​​art - and I understand the close. If you're a good artist, then in the race will receive a good picture, if something bad did not get it. And sit back and pick something, "his" - do not know ... Because I have pictures, direct analogies that I do not know, for example, Love and Hate. Wrote and wrote, and went himself on ...
__________________
художник Ixygon - http://artnow.ru/ru/gallery/3/9765/picture/0/0.html




Последний раз редактировалось Seriy; 07.09.2011 в 18:34.
Seriy вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Seriy за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (07.09.2011)
 


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
A good artist - a successful artist? AlexanderG Investing in Art 431 27.03.2010 22:39




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 08:00.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot