Own picture for criticism

[Fed]

Сообщение от sur; 1454461"

but it seems to me a lot in it by Aivazovsky.

So great.
The water is very good at it, not even for a self-taught. Now the rest of the landscape - so much was on Shishkin and problem solved.
In Harlampy Kostandi sea markedly less worked. While the rest of the landscape, more cheerful. Popular, but now the price is in general good. Higher than that of the famous Cyriacus Kostandi who lived with him at one time, graduated from the Academy, and wrote an incomparably better.

In general, needed to bridge the gap between the quality of water and land. And then they looked separately.
And the ships you did not try to portray? It may happen without the land to manage.