Round Table problems examination

[K-Maler]

Read an article about the examination , conference, etc. Round Table was held in Moscow.
Experts correctly answered " We do not want to write the details , as this will be a guide for forgery ."
Almost immediately, I was shown a review ( positive) and the estimate ( high) at the picture of the artist that I know (that it works). I can see , even on a bad photo, it's a fake . Details can not tell , because very simple and " poddelschiki fix" ...
But I'm no expert .... And experts who had a license , not a well known works by this artist (modern ) ....
Vildenshtayn recall : " I ​​do not need an expert on Monet , myself an expert on Monet, Gauguin ... etc."
I can see how the right to grant review and evaluate the pictures received by people not versed in the matter ... Some quick " museum courses"
produce crisp ...
There is in this vicious circle, something intrinsically bad .
Was positive from Moscow discussion?