Compromise 2

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I read the topic compromise. There were some thoughts, but that topic is now closed (why?).

created his own, new, but the continuation of that.

I do not understand where the issue arose discomfort when reading messages AlexanderG.
Just look at the attendance of his order and it will be clear: the Latin script of his message can not be compared with interest in his subjects.
See:

Is it possible to create and develop the art market without kommodifikatsii art? - 6 583 views;

What distinguishes the true artist is not from this? - 8 375;

The role of art dealer - 8 268;

and finally record theme A good artist - a successful artist? - 21 576 ! ! !

These figures, I think, about something they say.

And the second point that I made from the threads:
Many participants have already complained nazoylevye random comments, in their opinion, but aggressive in their ignorance, the participants.

I understand that the face-control and intellect control the entrance to the forum is not set, but then the administration should undertake awareness-raising some or ruthlessly cleaned theme from incompetent bleating.
Otherwise, the forum is just the bleating and left.

And if the participants painters think that the topic of soil and quality canvases are all interesting, they are mistaken: such "elementary discovery" is not the forum for this level.
Sorry, this is not an evening art school for adults uncles and aunts. Adults uncles and aunts can about these and Ahaz learn from textbooks.

[Eriksson]

Rudeness and personal attacks can not be tolerated either in real life or virtual.
However, in my opinion, the topic was not entitled to dismiss or censure members, even one showing full dilentantizm, cretinism, or "flood" for nothing. Otherwise, this is not a forum, and with the speaker of the Duma Gryzlov, shocked the world with his incorruptible "council-not a place for discussion."
To ban, cleansing, and others are administrators, nurses forests. Sometimes, I think they are even reinsured, but perhaps better than re- what an under-.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I read the topic compromise. There were some thoughts, but that topic is now closed (why?).


And the second point that I made from the threads:
Many participants have already complained nazoylevye random comments, in their opinion, but aggressive in their ignorance, the participants.

I understand that the face-control and intellect control the entrance to the forum is not set, but then the administration should undertake awareness-raising some or ruthlessly cleaned theme from incompetent bleating.
Otherwise, the forum is just the bleating and left.

And if the participants painters think that the topic of soil and quality canvases are all interesting, they are mistaken: such "elementary discovery" is not the forum for this level.
Sorry, this is not an evening art school for adults uncles and aunts. Adults uncles and aunts can about these and Ahaz learn from textbooks.

It is very unpleasant to read, when people who identify themselves as artists, can afford to sling mud at other artists. More successful or famous. Enough to browse messages in the past week. Most of these "geniuses" that devotes no less time than watering the dirt of those who actually works today in the art business.
 In fact the site on investing in art. If more - on the art business. I want to talk about the problems of art-business, and not discuss the history of the mother who is more valuable from the present site of artists. What is it? The notorious "positive discrimination"? Demonstration of a false liberalism?

And the right to listen to all this malevolence and teachings from someone really something dobivshegosya. How to advance his art as a commodity, and actually in the art has reached any heights.

I would be all right in half with mud, but at least a grain of some useful information to catch. So after all is not.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eriksson

the topic was not entitled to dismiss or censure members, even one showing full dilentantizm, cretinism, or "flood" for nothing.

Agree. This is not an option, I am against such "slingshots."

Сообщение от Eriksson

To ban, cleansing, and others are administrators, nurses forests.

And I'm about the same.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Otherwise, this is not a forum, and with the speaker of the Duma Gryzlov, shocked the world with his incorruptible "council-not a place for discussion."
[/B].

Discussions at the level of "fool itself" is already fed up. This is not a children's sandbox. And not a kindergarten Olympic reserve.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Eriksson

To ban, cleansing, and others are administrators, nurses forests. Sometimes, I think they even reinsured, but perhaps better than re- than an under-.

Exactly. I do stronnitsa that the bans apply only in extreme cases. I'm for that clean and pure. Sanitation and sanitation. Then napisak establishing a conditioned reflex: "write all this nonsense and filth is useless, it will still erase"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Berth

And the right to listen to all this malevolence and teachings from someone really something dobivshegosya.

I do not think that living with us at the same time the artists whose work, for example, provided in the State Tretyakov Gallery, the exhibition on the Crimean and sink to such "discussions" that we see the of their male colleagues, the local participants.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Rudeness and personal attacks can not be tolerated either in real life or virtual.
However, in my opinion, the topic was not entitled to dismiss or censure members, even one showing full dilentantizm, cretinism, or "flood" for nothing. Otherwise, this is not a forum, and with the speaker of the Duma Gryzlov, shocked the world with his incorruptible "council-not a place for discussion."
To ban, cleansing, and others are administrators, nurses forests. Sometimes, I think they even reinsured, but perhaps better than re- than an under-.

Absoltno agree, but "Flooding" should be less.

[Причал]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I do not think that living with us at the same time the artists whose work, for example, provided in the State Tretyakov Gallery, the exhibition on the Crimean and sink to such "discussions" that we see the of their male colleagues, the local participants.

I am a regular, daily contact with the artists. The most successful, recognized in general no one ever hayut. Besides discussing the usual work of each other not for the eyes, in the case. Typically, when asked.

These "discussions" which are the artists of forum I have heard only from those who have not passed, nothing is accomplished, in whom no one wants to stand on those with whom decent artists do not want to exhibit in some rooms.
And just normal artists do not boors, as apparently decided of forum "genius".

Yes, many artists do not like the work of other artists. Living there, died there. As someone said on this forum, it is necessary for them to maintain the integrity of its sense of self. Well after them and no one is forcing anyone to love. Why is brought to the attention of others? Surrounding them have so requested.

[LCR]

I must say that reading the message, written in Latin script, personally, I feel uncomfortable (so that I now say? I have not thought up myself, but somehow found ). But I am interested in their content - so I read them, just as I read the book in a series of Pléïade (some equivalent of the Soviet Academy of publications), published a beautiful but very small print on the "Bible" paper, because these texts can not find anywhere else . That's me to the fact that everyone decides for himself that outweighs, inconvenience or use. AlexanderG - an intelligent and competent people, I have his communication benefit.

I think that this forum is a place for everything, including the practical issues that arise from the artist (clay, etc.). Of course, if the forum was limited to considering these issues, I would not participate in it - I would have had nothing to say.
However, I, like others, put here the message and thus recognition S, I believe that I can bring something positive. In communications, I give the information of another kind, and this information might be interested in some, but all the others it does not interfere. That is, from the revenues of the head does not hurt or, as my distant relative, "Pitka not ubitka."
What is really important - it is the reliability of the information. So many times I always check it before you put here, and would recommend to do it.

Now about the flood: a little flooding, it does not matter. The trouble, when it dissolves all the rest, but this problem must address and solve administration.

Finally, on diaries, open or closed. Already by the fact that I have not led it yourself, you can judge my attitude towards them. I must admit, I put my transfer in order to be able to read a lot of people who are interested in this theme.
I do not like the idea of closed ghetto (I would not want to live on Rublevke ).
We must try to get along in this cyber-space with all its flaws (and it also has considerable merit, otherwise you and I would not be here), but is always another option - to leave.

That's about as

[Marta]

In my opinion, there is nothing easier. Make a forum open only to registered site artinvestment, for the rest - only to read and participate freely in a few themes: "Buy," Buy, "and something like "Ask an Expert". And the question will be closed.