A good artist - a successful artist?

[Самвел]

Schedule, the more such masters as Goncharova, especially at home does not hang, because the patched they can not be displayed, in the light more than 3 months, the remaining 9-they must rest. Then take care of graphics rather difficult is that some methods of storage, wetting sheet etc.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Meister

artcol, most of the artist are also graphs. Well, you also will not deny that painting is cheaper graphics? As for the demand you are absolutely right, but the cheaper thing, so it is available. And, thanks to the chart, the house may appear well-known names as oil Goncharova, for example, can buy the favorites, but the graphics (eg, theatrical costumes) much more accessible rest.

Retorted: in the process of creating works of art (PI), the artist creates a lot of rough and preparatory material, the first is always cheaper than a complete UI. And for painting preparatory material will be mainly be a painting (except for figure mb) ... etc.
No figures can argue ad infinitum ...
For the silver century agree with your assertion, but otherwise - will convince only numbers.
By the way the ratio of graphics and painting can be seen on this site as a result of trades, and art prices.

[Meister]

willing to bet that the cost of graphics impressionists, expressionists, Fauvism, bubnovalettsev, Russian avant-garde of the sixties is less than the cost of their paintings. I think the examples here are unnecessary?

[LCR]

Originally Posted by Meister

willing to bet that the cost of graphics impressionists, expressionists, Fauvism, bubnovalettsev, Russian avant-garde of the sixties is less than the cost of their paintings. I think the examples here are superfluous?

Hitryuga Master quoted in the main direction, graphic artists are doing little or not doing.
You can imagine Malevich, which makes the preparatory sketches from nature for his black square?

But Schiele drawings, for example, are not much cheaper than his own painting (the exact data I do not, look for sloth).
I do not know the price of drawings Sveshnikov, but in all fairness they should cost much more than his own painting.

Now about the restoration. I now click on "no opinion", because it all depends on the subject (and on the restoration). That is, if I was, for example, Raphael in very bad condition, I would not hesitate for one second and showed it to restore * *.
On the other hand, say, fell off a butterfly wing from some dick (CT) barn or tail of kunsovskogo rabbit, where the problem? stick it, and that's that!

That is, I want to say, collectors prefer to buy the work before the restoration, and they are right. Man is more or less random, of course, buy now only "commodity" form.

[Meister]

As for Sheila disagree, oil is much more expensive graphics.
Well, if LCR do not like me all these directions, then we take the Russian diaspora. What is also not suitable? And under the Russian avant-garde, I realized not only by Malevich, Rodchenko and, Suetina, Lisitsky, Popova, etc. They are sooooo oil is rarely seen in the market and the money is insane. But the schedule of these characters find it difficult but possible.


Let's talk about the restoration, yet limit the time to 19-20 century. About Raphael's no denying it.

[Маргарита]

Originally Posted by Samvel

graphics, the more such masters as Goncharova, especially at home does not hang, because the patched they can not be displayed, in the light more than 3 months, the remaining 9-they must rest. Then look for graphics rather difficult is that some methods of storage, wetting sheets, etc.

that is, as it does not hang??: eek:
be stored in more detail about the graphics? uli ssylochku at worst)

[qwerty]

Originally Posted by artcol

A schedule it at all difficult to sell ...
Although recognized, though unrecognized ...

Look just appeared on this site indexes art market: Graphics recently sold better painting!

[color="# 666686"]Posted 15 minutes[/color]

Originally Posted by Meister

As for Schiele disagree, oil is much more expensive graphics.
and under the Russian avant-garde, I realized not only by Malevich, and Rodchenko, Suetina, Lisitsky, Popov, etc. Their oil sooooo rarely appears on the market and the money is insane. But the schedule of these characters find it difficult but possible.

This is not quite so graphic Schiele often more expensive than his paintings, but these heroes of the Russian avant-garde long gone on the market in any form. If in a year there is one work - this is quite an event.

In addition, it should be noted that there is a wizard, which are known to have made it work in the schedule, immediately come to mind, Escher, old Japanese, Fujita, our V. Yakovlev, Siddur, Lyon. Recent trends: the rate of growth of prices for the schedule ahead of painting.

[artcol]

Index? Well, well ... : D
Show me a catalog of the auction, which charts more than painting ...
Graphics good sale - so the price it lower. Easy.
Reklamuoti schedule - good work. But the myth of oil "- to win ooooooochen difficult.

Shl And yet, the usual thing - pull out of context and begin to argue, have not decided anything.
Talked about the "recognized", and that under this Samvel understood - only he knows.
I do not think the modernists and the Europeans, but something else.

[qwerty]

Originally Posted by artcol

index? Well, well ... : D
Show me a catalog of the auction, which charts more than painting ...
Graphics good sale - so the price it lower. Easy.
Reklamuoti schedule - good work. But the myth of oil "- to win ooooooochen difficult.

Every year, dozens of auctions are held "Works On Paper" - there is only sold schedule. And her price is far below, not because it's worse for sale, but because it is considered that the artist spent less labor, although it is certainly not the case. And it is beginning to understand more and more people that can be seen from the indices referred to the art market.

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by artcol

Reklamuoti schedule - good work.

Why it untwist, meaning? if the artist is called-even graphics goes to ura.A what pastels 19 th century, the beginning of 20 century? "It was a miracle ..