Traders?

[ikoku]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

For me too, but I think that ikoku was due to "speculators", ie people going on a deliberate deception, fraud, fraud.

Agree that swindlers rather than adventurers. Mne in word adventurer really like the positive aspects - the risk, adventure, danger and unexpected company in the hope of success. But there is a downside - unprincipled, obviously not a fair deal of relevance to fraud or adultery.

Posted 10 minutes

Originally Posted by AlexanderG

My mozem naiti mnozestvo analogichnyh primerov so storony hudoznikov

Yeah! Artists that more people!
Still we should not forget that the profession of artist is not so new (in Russia) as a gallery owner and dealer. Everything we learn from our mistakes.

Added after 18 minutes

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Artist gallerist /dealer must love and respect. They were the first people to him, without them, and he and his family without food remain. Literally. And an artist can take money only from them. Give them the same duty to be able to their job.
Neighbors did not give "for the layman artist more despicable than" huckster ", in that although there is money, and this-" beggars erratic ", not status, not stability: simply lumpen margin, not a serious person with thoughtless profession.

Cyril Syzransky! Artist gallerist /dealer must love and respect not because of the fact that they can beg for money, but because of basic respect for the people to each other.
A man in the street, our lot to despise, and that's the janitor, too, goes past him and then the same piece of paper on the asphalt throw - will clear despicable lumpen. And then cursing all and sundry why muddy streets.

[AlexanderG]

But there is a downside - unprincipled, obviously not a fair deal of relevance to fraud or adultery.

Ne fakt!

 elementary respect for the people to each other.

Nikogda etogo ne ponimal. Uvazenie nado zasluzit '. Neitral'noe otnoshenie - eto vsio na chto mogut rasschityvat 'neznakomtsy.

Posle 3-5 riumki - Ty menia uvazaesh'???

[Fed]

Originally Posted by LCR

The report from the Fed --
I do not understand the subject matter of the two sides. If the trader bought the work because of how much he sold it did not matter the artist.
LCR-not true now - dealing with: the sale to the merchant must pay the artist the right to succeed.

    Nevertheless, the resale value of work did not cause the artist. Yes, and droit de force is not everywhere.

Originally Posted by LCR

gallery owner has no right "to violate the percentage mark-up on the work undertaken to implement. Romario rights, final prices should be monitored.

 Who will supervise them in reality at the time of sale? Although this is not right to change the%, but if the job appears to hang because of this, and sold, then the hypothetical pritenzii look a bit fantastic.

Originally Posted by LCR

What is the receipt? And what do you with a receipt that going to do? Wake up, Fed!

  Rogues have always been. To do this, and take a receipt. But this is a topic about rogues, and gallery owners here asked why they are called artists (disliked), dealers, gallery owners and do not call them dauber.
  Pritenzy, I actually can not be. Unless of course one another something is not pulled, but it is a mutual problem.

[Martin]

Message deleted

[iside]

Originally Posted by Fed

Who will supervise them in reality at the time of sale? Although this is not right to change the%, but if the job appears to hang because of this, and sold, then the hypothetical pritenzii look a bit fantastic.

Fed, for some reason you are talking one-sidedly only on the price increase, and may actually be lowering prices, which means lower total quotes the artist as well, or not?

[LCR]

Originally Posted by Fed

Nevertheless, the resale value of work did not cause the artist. Yes, and droit de force is not everywhere.

The artist can not influence the value of paintings have been sold, no one argues the contrary. However, the gallery owner is obliged to (and this is a legal obligation) to make him aware of the sale and transfer him to follow, which acts as the territory of Russia, and throughout the EU.

Originally Posted by Fed

Who will supervise them in reality at the time of sale? Although this is not right to change the%, but if the job appears to hang because of this, and sold, then the hypothetical pritenzii look a bit fantastic.

That is all the talk about honesty - a whim, and in favor of the poor?
That's why some gallery owners and characterize all sorts of awkward questions epithets.

As control, I can tell you from personal experience that within a week after the sale of some of Roginskii I usually already know who sold to whom and for how much.

[Самвел]

shopkeeper, merchant, this is not a profession, it is such a breed.

[ikoku]

Originally Posted by AlexanderG

 elementary respect for the people to each other.

Nikogda etogo ne ponimal. Uvazenie nado zasluzit '. Neitral'noe otnoshenie - eto vsio na chto mogut rasschityvat 'neznakomtsy.

Posle 3-5 riumki - Ty menia uvazaesh'???

Alexander, if you do not understand what a basic respect, then the meaning of the conversation is lost. Not all the same able to "serve". Learn to respect others and people will answer by the same ..

[Fed]

Where does honesty. The artist received his money, in no way harmed, where there are epithets. That is the question.

[ikoku]

LCR, about Popov's just no words! I did not expect.