Relationship and mutual obligations between the artist and gallery owners

[AlexanderG]

Vot prostye opredeleniia, dumaiu, chto perevediot avtomatom.

According to the 1997 Princeton University WordNet 1.6 dictionary definition the terms investment and speculation are as follows:
Investment is:
`The act or practice of buying land, goods, shares, etc., In expectation of selling at a higher price, or of selling with the expectation of repurchasing at a lower price; a trading on anticipated fluctuations in price, as distinguished from trading in which the profit expected is the difference between the retail and wholesale prices, or the difference of price in different markets.
An item of value purchased for income or capital appreciation. '
Speculation is:
`An investment that is very risky but could yield great profits; engagement in risky business transactions on the chance of quick or considerable profit. '
According to these definitions speculation is just one form of investment, but with greater risk.

[kozhinart]

The relationship of the artist and gallery owner must stand on a solid economic basis without snot. Unless, of course, the artist really appreciates himself and not live in a twilight world of his genius.

Almost all the artists live in this mire.Chto and prevents them united in a critical moment.Kak example of this could be collaboration with unscrupulous entrepreneur, gallerists. Each of the artists, even if you possess information about this person behaves in thinking that he was an artist, a genius, and rightly so this bezdaryam.No, sadly, falls into the same situation, and that mediocrity ...

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от kozhinart

The relationship of the artist and gallery owner must stand on a solid economic basis without snot. Unless, of course, the artist really appreciates himself and not live in a twilight world of his genius.

Oops. is so ephemeral .. and on .. Where is "starting point"? We go only artists realists? Or all?

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

with banal speculation

This concept, in etohu total difitsita, replacing the notion of - business. We can not speculate on the health, misfortune, etc. ....( with a universal point of view). And if I have you bought for three rubles, and sold it for gold piece - so I thought that the income I get, meet today's requirements, and you do not have the opportunity to sell more than three-spot ... And nothing more. Because, reinvest it into another gold piece goods, I plan to get a quarter a ticket faster than the first ... sorry that so mercenary about high ... But we're here, right now, only the investment (without mucus on solid economic basis "). For an investment - an investment of capital to generate income (and not metsenatstvo or charity). And nothing more. And the professionalism of investment show only the results ...
Sorry, not really my issue, as I have been doing gallery business and investing, only part of it ...

[Pavel]

If invistitsii this investment, then the art is to buy. Someone buys and waiting when the thing will go up. Selling more costly thing gets income.
This is in general. In the details it looks like, to select the thing it should be compared with others. This usually occurs at trade shows and similar events. Artists declare themselves to everyone. The audience gets the illusion of freedom of choice. Here traders who do not appreciate art and reviews of them (for art work). Then, fans and collectors and gallery owners to buy something, take note. This is the most advantageous time to buy. This buying. How to sell the purchased item? this also must be a mechanism completely public, credible. Everywhere this auction. But he really public but not quite unmanageable. Manages the same dealers from the audience. Auctions can be a lot from the simple to the elite. Auction receives interest and pays taxes but does not affect prices. But he uzakanivaet these prices and can sell the thing at any time, repeatedly, the same percentage he received in any case, but sell the evaluators make up the collection and the auction does not have a relationship, they only have room for a percentage of sales.
Thus it is possible the circulation of things, which in turn balances the demand and prices. This is the key point is missing and there is only sale. Prices can not be governed by and of course doubtful. Therefore, almost no trade, and buy izdalya where price auction, but selling it is another matter. Again, the passage and taxes.
This topic is quite broad-write books. So in a nutshell.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

But he uzakanivaet these prices and can sell the thing at any moment many times

"At any time"? "Many times"?
to your lips yes med drink! (c)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

"At any time"? "Many times"?
to your lips yes med drink!(a)

I did not do this has long been thought up in the USA, Australia, wool at auction in Japan, the fish, all in France.

[AlexanderG]

The auction receives interest and pays taxes but does not affect prices.

Auktsionnye doma prekrasno manipuliruiut tseny. Suschestvuet mnozestvo mehanizmov.

But he uzakanivaet these prices and can sell the thing at any time

Soglasen, auktsiony sozdaiut likvidnist ', no eto zanimaet neskol'ko let.

Prices unregulated

Art rynok - poslednii nereguliruemyi rynok v mire. Tsenoobrazovanie svobodnoe.

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

The biggest mistake of creators (artists) - to give their creations "to implement" as seamstress or consumer goods in lavku.V this case, the seller is no incentive to sell - is not selling, and to hell with him, true. "artist, give money and he whom you sold to turn up on the wrong side to get back their money and" weld ".

"... as shirpotred the shop" - means this product is not in demand in another market. If we talk about collaboration with the gallery, then there must exist a mutual benefit, and not unilateral. Otherwise, cooperation will not work. If I, as galereistu, profitable to buy the work, I'll do it. But always buy, of course, will not. And to "hang" of the gallery I also do not benefit - from what time to live (to invest, hold exhibitions ... to eat, feed the family and contain ...) gallery. Therefore, being selected works, and not put up those you have given ...
The gallery for some reason decided to reduce (some of the artists) to a simple light-sale profits, and the artist - a creative, hard, inscrutable work. Bad luck ...: confused:

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

the gallery for some reason decided to reduce (some of the artists) to a simple light-sale profits, and the artist - a creative, hard, nepos tizhimomu work. Bad luck ...

These "some" simply constructed primitive and holicheskogo (holistic) view of the world is not merely Recommends, in this and the problem .. (and never about his gallery did not think ..)