"Bulldozer Exhibition" - 35

[ранжер]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

The times were dirty

The times, indeed, as usual, and have always been wrong, that it is necessary, but without exaggeration and glorification can be dispensed with, not to betray the truth hypothesis, sometimes very much questionable (it's about the mustard in my boots!).
Do not forget that these people, as would say, Madame Gritsatsuyeva were bohemians. Young, hot, lively merry and allowed themselves to many things that would not have understood (and condemned) is not only simple Russian boys and girls, but most of their European peers.

[Posav]

Originally Posted by Maroussia

See post#28 "Buldoozernaya vystavka2.doc"
Quality of course, a magazine article, but you can get some idea.

Watched, but there is no special criticism. Raikin steeper castigated bureaucrats and managers. Now, by the way, in the former Soviet Union do not bichuyut - bad for careers. In addition to the icons with a comment "give coal ..." , But it's easy banter and even a little bit past. It is now used religion to please hold the power.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

ranzher, I'm talking about "mustard gas in the boots" never wrote, and mentioned the three Russian writers, two of which were awarded to accept the Nobel for literature.

[Маруся]

Originally Posted by Posav

I looked, but there is no special criticism.

That's it. So why deny it? Yes more pictures of spray water to be no one else saw ... Yes, more arrests and repression ...

[fross]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

ranzher, I'm talking about "mustard gas in the boots" never wrote, and mentioned the three Russian writers, two of whom were awarded the Nobel for literature accept.

Yes? And I also had a vision

[Вивьен]

It is not that what art direction has been working and how much they were worth after the event and they are now, and that people have found the courage at that time to fight for the right of existence of his works.

[Маруся]

Originally Posted by Pavel

This was not an exhibition as a provocation-hooliganism.

Paul!
What kind of hooliganism you say?
September 2 artists were sent to Moscow City Council a letter informing city officials that "September 15 ... organized the first autumn show of paintings in the open air. Such a not very attractive as a place of emptiness, we have chosen for one simple reason: the exposition of paintings on the square, street or promenade can easily be construed in accordance with Soviet law as a "breach of public order." At the same vacant lot or people do not go, no car is not running, so it is impossible to violate the order ... "
 
A provocation, certainly was, but - with the authorities! Deny - not banned, but it was arranged without fail subbotnik on this vacant lot.

[Posav]

Maroussia, must not only say what I want to build a rally, but wait for written permission. Now unions write applications for several months, waiting for an answer, and often they are offered a place for the meeting is not something that was said.

Write what were unhappy dissidents who had the fate (or thought-out move) to leave the USSR. Well then, let's calculate how many of them returned after Yeltsin proclaimed freedom.
  I think that many of them very much like this left.
Imagine that now some officials from the embassies of countries unfriendly to buy a lot of money for work critical of the existing system. Even the prospect of departure is, the benefits to the refugee and sell for good money. How is art or direction would be free and not biased?
     As for the fight in the field. This Cogan or whoever, he happily reports that the first hit and broke his nose peasant and then swooped down on him. And it is nothing broke for it. Now in all the scuffle opponents, too, and banners are torn, too. Pouring water is also not news.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Pavel, and you except money, money, money can of something to write?
And why such disrespect for fellow artists?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

And I do not!
You want to, Pavel, the Tretyakov something? Oh, you want to ...
But do not take. : D

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

And, well, of course ...
The water in the tap no-take into account the nationality of ...

What is the point in the Tretyakov Gallery, lie deep in the store? I know many who work in the Tretyakov Gallery, but not in the exhibition. Moreover, we must give and humiliated in front of these self-righteous to pretend that the tea from which they tore off much more important than some idiot with his pictures and in general their husbands artists and they know everything. They do not rodstvennik.A so these ordered them to buy and allocate the money, and even sponsors kakieto there, and only found a place nobody wants to watch. Foreigners its first such bottling why they second.
Furthermore Tretyakovka dropped to pre-auction exhibition in England, as hinted Faibisovich, and this is a disgrace. In the pre-auction exhibition of the Louvre?
The money is needed it is true, the sculpture must be cast in bronze. And the congress of Koi where.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Originally Posted by Maroussia

Slava!
Not very clear from your message, "what is good and what is bad".

History does not know the subjunctive mood.
Who can say, would create Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy "if it had not been expelled from Florence ....
  Bad that stifled the thought squeezed into the framework of bureaucratic practices and misanthropic ideology. However, as one would say an artist - now of course "nonkomformist", raising a toast at a dinner after a solemn assembly - "Freedom and satiety we are contraindicated, comrades"
Well that was not the courts - and triples the camps with his release from 58y (times really were not the same - and may therefore went to the vacant lot).