Theater room

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

I decided to drag her here a random message from a different theme:

I recommend the play "Theatrical Novel" in the theater SCOPE (Moscow, the Hermitage Garden). The play about people in the arts, after seeing who wants to keep their distance. As in this forum - do not know would not see, and most importantly not to hear some of the characters.
Performance old, comes with 1980, indicating that capacity. In those years, he changed the ticket to the ticket in Lenkom for "Juno and Avos" in the proportion 1 /1.
Catherine Glavrezh Elanskaya. Earlier in this room filmed "Tavern 13 chairs, and then gave the theater-studio" Sphere ". In the late 90-ies, I even wrote an angry letter to the newspaper "Pravda" (or "The News"?), When he saw there smasher. Theater exclusive gourmet-drama: a round stage in the middle, the hall for a maximum of 7 rows. The best part - watch from 1 sector and the first series - the most you feel the energy of the actor. How often had the sweat flows under the spotlight in the literal and figurative senses! Yes, tickets are very inexpensive by Moscow standards - 500 rubles.
They often use live music. There are children's shows - very funny and not just for children - "Murli" and "springtime tale".

I recommend:
Theatrical Novel
Lolita
Little Prince

Do not recommend:
Caesar and Cleopatra - like everything is there (actor, director, Bernard Shaw), but the performance is not.

Misc: to taste. If anyone is interesting - will advise.

www.theatresphera.ru



In the student youth I was a great theatrical. Last season managed to visit 80 to 100 performances. For me, there was no theater can not be reached. Although the Soviet Union and was a terrible shortage of tickets for good (or popular) productions. But I could always get into any theater for peanuts (in the literal sense of the word) or free (showing stud. Ticket administrator). And to sit through five minutes after the third ring in your favorite 3.4 row of the stalls in the middle. The main thing - to withstand the correct pause so as not driven comrades are late from the buffet.
Who could have imagined then that the Soviet Union collapsed, and theater tickets at a decent place would cost 100-200 dollars?

PS In our living room do not smoke! had my will - always be forbidden to smoke in Reale. But although virtually "should drop off."

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Start typing a series of last year's letters to his friends at the theater. There is a little personal, but very little. Consciously not editing text.


Posted June 13, 2008 Zenaida M.


June 12 my wife was on the theater's sphere, which is located in Hermitage. You know this place? In honor of the festival (June 12 - the day Russia) played Symphony Orchestra (free), people listened and danced, we ate dinner in a local cafe, the mood was excellent. As if left for a day to rest abroad from our village near Moscow.
 
On June 18 I have previously bought two tickets in the same theater on "Lolita" by Nabokov. I watched this play back in the USSR in the same theater, it is interesting to see again. SCOPE - very unusual theater. It is the smallest among the hall of the Moscow theaters - places for a hundred. The scene in the middle of the ranks around, like a circus. The action of the play is unfolding right in front of you, sometimes in two or three steps. There are performances with audience participation (this is called interactive).
Because обалденного mood I called Csete M and invited join us on June 18, they agreed, so I went to buy two more tickets. Then I called Sergei and y (Company E-ah), and then to Eugene G-woo (company C-T). In a word, has purchased seven tickets, purchased almost the entire fourth series in 1 (best) sector. The result of such a group kultpohod.
It turned out that people need only push a lot, so difficult for us to arrange your own holiday itself. If desired, you can still join us!

  PS joined by Nicholas K. with a girl. It is unlikely that he wants to see the play itself, but rather will hold business talks and asking for money. The good people come together from one business, who know each other.

  PPS next to us in the series have only one unsold seat! It is always reserved for glavrezha Katherine Elanskii. Interestingly, we see her?


June 13, 2008

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Everything, "Twenty Letters to a Friend", as Svetlana Alliluyeva. : D
No, Nikolai Gogol. "Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends. : shy:

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Posted July 25, 2008 a group of recipients.

Latest report on several performances, seen during the summer in 2008 I must say that all performances can be divided into four groups:

1) failure. Lack of professionalism of actors and director.
2) Boring. It seems to have everything - normal actors, directing, scenery, text. But look bored.
3) soundly. Not necessarily famous, but good actors and director, a decent text.
4) Strong. Not necessarily famous, but good actors and director, a decent text. But cool!

Type the first characteristic of weak provincial theaters and Moscow outsiders, which I try not to walk. Sin and academic, particularly when trying to go in the wake of the mass audience.

Most of Moscow's performances belong to 3 types, or by 2 type. Even with the availability of well-known artists and popular theater. For example: play "Lolita" in the "field" I refer to number 3. The play "The Break-feminine" in the "Mayak" (Theater. Mayakovsky) and "Caesar and Cleopatra" in the "Sphere" - a type 2. It was found that a well-known Bernard Shaw wrote a very boring in our time play. And does not help anything - beautiful scenery, добротная game artists, attempts director. Just bored.

The most interesting to watch, of course, Number 4. I must say that in my youth theater, when I visited from 80 to 100 performances per season, to the 4 types can be attributed only a few performances of this hundred. Alas, the talented little productions. And so they are more valuable. I decided to write this, it is useless letter, in order to share with you one interesting pattern:
I looked for my life just three plays on the complex and difficult novels of Fyodor Dostoevsky. And they all belong to such a rare type 4! Despite the different actors and directors, in different theaters and different times of the production.



to be continued ...

[SAH]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, probably chose the forum as a platform for his novel, with magazines obviously do not get an agreement, requested can be expensive or nature did not agree. Now we sweat: D: D: mad:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

SAH, The story will be long. Letters will be long. I'll run ahead and
back to the very beginning. God forbid - it is not a novel, not a biography and not
memoirs; sequential presentation will not be. (c)
: D

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Continuation.

The first was "The Idiot" on the small stage DATS Like this year, in 1989. Then I went to this theater of despair - in other Moscow theaters on this day there was nothing interesting for me. But I had somewhere to be reduced the same girl from the city of Smolensk. Four hours passed like an hour. It is a pity that I do not see in contemporary playbill for this performance is reviewed again.

In May 2008, we Natalia (ex-girlfriend from the city of Smolensk), went on "Karamazov" at Mayak. Hall is full even on weekdays. This performance, which is all - powerful text, famous actors, добротная direction, the active development of the plot. At the same time takes a few lines of love (drama). You are trying to figure out who had actually killed the father Karamazov (a detective?). Alas, the ending of the performance somewhat muddled - so, you should read the book to find out how it really was. And for some reason occasionally the audience laughing heartily. Is it comedy? No, because the level of jokes too high. Prior to the performance and during intermission on the street is a military brass band. Nice! In short, very easy to browse and fascinating spectacle. In addition, you will hear several world-famous aphorism of Dostoevsky and be able to enjoy them. Duration of the performance of more than 3 hours (one intermission). Looks a maximum of 2 hours. Recommended sites - 1-4 a number of stalls in the middle.
In July 2008 we went to Natalia on "Devils" in the "Contemporary". Hall is full even on weekdays. Initially, I did not like - the impression that the 3-hour film director Andrzej Wajda want to quickly read the entire text of the book - so fast talking artists. This is a minus. Text Dostoevsky requires a slow thoughtful reading. It was easier, as I read this book in one breath while resting on about. Samui (Thailand). Consequently, I knew what the artists say. But gradually the situation sorts itself out. Of course, the play was removed from the existing lot in the novel - not enough time. Pity. But the storyline saved. Then you can write the same thing, like about "The Brothers Karamazov. Just great!
             Duration of the performance of more than 3 hours (one intermission). Looks a maximum of 2 hours. Recommended sites - 4-5 a number of stalls in the middle (not closer! Scene is high).

What's the matter? While at the different actors and directors and various theaters and times, the outcome of one - excellent! One hundred percent hit in 4 number! Performances for the mind and the heart. My only conclusion - the text is everything. No text - no play. There is a plot - there is a strong performance. Of course, in the presence of professionals.

Recommended! We now want to see ALL of Moscow performances by F. Dostoyevsky. You have not heard, where there is "Crime and Punishment"? They say that this is a very exciting detective story and psychological thriller "in one bottle." And besides dramatic love!

To be continued ...

[SAH]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

SAH, story will be long. Letters will be long. I'll run ahead and
back to the very beginning. God forbid - it is not a novel, not a biography and not
memoirs; sequential presentation will not be. (c)

Presented, yes nothing, it's good that agranomy, beekeeper and other people of other professions in this forum is not got into the habit, even if their crisis prigonit then really Hove. How to begin to write each of his, that's when my mother did not worry. please note that all professions hold in high esteem

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от SAH

agranomy, Pasechnik

Here are their professional stories I read to.
And this theater, circus, show, attractions ...

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Posted 14 August 2008 a group of recipients.

The last six days, alas, does not cause the desire to rest. Watch the news and waiting for the Third World ... I think running or not in the nearest Auchan (Supermarket) taritsya canned?

                 In addition, in August - a month dead. Most of the theaters finally finished the season. But, I personally would like to see something else on Dostoevsky. Even the same performances that we have seen in other theaters.
                 Currently reading "The Brothers Karamazov" and understand that the performance Lighthouse took just a few storylines from the huge quantity. Strongly reduced number of events and the number of characters.
Read difficult. Required silence and concentration. Unable to read Dostoevsky in snatches as an easy reading. Understanding the complexity and special archaic language of Dostoevsky. Artificially archaic. After all, at one time lived with him and Leo Tolstoy wrote a quite modern Russian language, like Turgenev and Gogol. Pushkin was even earlier, but reading it is much easier.
                 But when with some difficulty wade through the text - you get great pleasure from the book. Concentrate of the characters, events, emotions, extraordinary! Now I understand very well why the FM so popular in the West, why is it based on talking about the "mysterious Russian soul". Whatever hero, the abyss of suffering and ideas. All as one "not in itself".
                 There is no other writer with such an abundance of events, emotions and philosophies in a book. Even it is difficult to describe - what is it? Cartoons, drama or mysticism?
All the other writers make "toilet water" or "spirits", while FM - exclusively concentrate, which can be diluted in large proportions. Is that enough for a couple of hundred other famous writers.
                 Recently I read a lot of Stephen King. I liked him on the "Dark Tower". But everything else that I read in a responsible search for a new "pearl", is simply boring. And it is known in the West by!

[B]Posted August 14, 2008 [B]