Petrov, Arkady Ivanovich

[Евгений]

Сообщение от antip

And with regard to behold such Petrovykh is mediocre biznes.Proizvoditelnost
such work is high, it can be foolish head and share a single passage in
tram at about 20 years ahead

Сообщение от fross

I join by simply working: horror-awful.

-------------------------------------------------- -----------
From the book reviews from the exhibition (G. Bruskin "Life Is Everywhere") Pushkin Museum Pushkin (2001)
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Bruskin (and Rubinstein, too) should be ashamed. But the money is better than a conscience, is not it, gentlemen?

Alekseev. Retiree
------------------------------------------
Carefully inspected your exhibition. One thing is clear, your boss - the American dollar.

Elena B.
---------------------------------------------
Such daub not enter into eternity.

Wisher

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=4435
==================================
All this we have already passed my dear Frosya Antip ...

[Евгений]

Arkady Petrov on-ARTINFO

http://www.artinfo.ru/artbank/script...c?author_id=67

[Евгений]

Leonid Purygin (1951-1995) painter, classic Sots art ...
Leonid Purygin was born to a teacher and director of a toy factory in the small town of Naro near Moscow in 1951, before the era of "thaw" of Khrushchev's spring. Environment him since childhood toys mythology, poetry, "wooden Theater" Pinocchio had the same effect on his consciousness, like staying young Kandinsky in a farmhouse, filled with icons.

Читать дальше... 

magic item, a toy, a paradoxical object on the verge of a magical sleep and the immediate reality of LA Purygin transformed into an artist. World of objects, living in a mystical layers of reality with which man comes into play and with whom he communicates with a virtual object, naturally turned to the work of L. Purygin in layers of his paintings, installations and sculptures-folding.

Any part of the arrangement is perceived as a living master of the universe, containing all of its properties and qualities, necessarily pierced tree of life, or a cross with the figure of the creator - the genius of Leni Purygin from Nara, which connects your body heaven and earth.
Collections:

The State Tretyakov Gallery (Moscow)

Moscow Museum of Modern Art (Moscow)

P. Ludwig Museum (Cologne, Germany)

Museum Henry Nannen (Emden, Germany)
Museum ART4.ru
http://www.art4.ru/ru/artists/detail.php?ID=391

The cost of work to 240t.ue.
http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/64?...=П&page=8

[fross]

Eugene

And the work of Mikhail Roginsky you нравяться? He is also a social art is

Very like. And shove it in a social art does not work, especially with fomulirovkoy "too. Not continue to be amazed by your attempts to compare what is called "apples and oranges."

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Eugene

is a gala you about sex or what?

Zhenya? .. It was cited by Advertising chocolate .. Greetings from Grandfather Freud? Sochi .. the sun .., hormones?

[antip]

Some are artists known as the great, outstanding, well-deserved ...
Our Leonid Purygin worthy to be called as "need artists."
The man is kind and gentle, which is equally loved and butterflies and people.
And it can dignify as "Confessor Sots Art.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от fross

And shove it into a social art fail

Creativity Mikhail Roginsky I like very much, I had nowhere stuffed, his art is a social art ...

Сообщение от antip

And yet it can dignify as "Confessor Sots Art".

Fully agree with you. (About Leonid Purygin)

Сообщение от Gala

Sochi .. the sun ..,

plus good mood ..

Сообщение от fross

It is like.

  Well at least that some of Sots Art, you like, have a look.

Сообщение от fross

social art

Frosya, Could you explain what you mean by the direction of the social art?
===============================================

                  Dip-art: Deep Art of the Cold War
Andrey Kovalev. Russian Journal. Inreresnaya article about a social art ..
http://old.russ.ru/krug/20000820_kov-pr.html

[fross]

Eugene

Frosya, Could you explain what you mean by the direction of the social art?

===============================================
In my view social art is all that use symbols and cliches of socialist reality, and this trend has been most extensively represented in the adjustment period. But I'm not an expert, and my opinion may be wrong.

Thank you for the article Kovalev. He has over the period of the last 50 years named: the new realism, social art, deep-art, metaphysics, surrealism, abstract art, mysticism. Where can I read: What other areas of art submitted to our modern art, and more in detail - their distinctive characteristics, the authors and major works?
And then all or political grounds conformist non-conformist, or by year-cities.: Confused:

[LCR]

Well, come: before my Roginsky all pop-art sewing, now a social art pasted

Do I have to say that I absolutely do not agree to these? But generally speaking, if someone so like, please, as they say, "even though you call a pot, just not put in the oven!

[color="# 666686"]Posted 27 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от fross

Eugene

Thank you for the article Kovalev. He has over the period of the last 50 years named: the new realism, social art, deep-art, metaphysics, surrealism, abstract art, mysticism. Where can I read: What other areas of art submitted to our modern art, and more in detail - their distinctive characteristics, the authors and major works?
And then all or political grounds conformist non-conformist, or by year-cities.: Confused:

Frosinka you sensitive mess

Deep-art ", there is no such direction, it is a joke (evil) - or not quite a joke - clever Andrei Kovalev, so you have to throw him out of your list, without delay, and tremble in his hand

As compensation for the ongoing censorship I propose to include a rich word "conceptualism" (Kabakov, Pivovarov, Bulatov, Vassiliev, Prigov, etc., etc.).

As pop art, the question was whether the USSR /Russia pop art, remains open. Andrei Erofeev, who organized the exhibition, the 2 back "Russian Pop Art" obviously believed there was. He defended his views in numerous articles and interviews on the subject (they are easily found on the internet). Other art historians and critics (which also can be read on the Internet) believe that it was not. I personally (not that it had any sort were important, I say it's just for information) is inclined to believe that there is no pop-art in there was not, and could not be.

Whoever I will explain the stylistic differences between metaphysics and mysticism in art, I am ready to give out their bins 1 copy of the catalog Roginsky

Sots Art - certainly the original direction, which originated in the USSR 70-e gg. Typically, the list of artists of this trend include Milamida and Komar, Lenya juices, Boria Orlova, Sasha Kosolapov, a group of "Nest" (Roshal - Skersis - Don), well beyond, I do not remember or do not know, but they are legion.
I read somewhere that Roginskii influenced the emergence of Sots Art, I do not know how true this is. In any case, it is the trend was not interested, although he adored juices, very fond Roshal - but not as artists Sots Art, and just as insanely talented artists.

Generally, there is such a book, "History of Russian Art" or something like that, write a scholarly lady named Catherine Tar. I have not read it - that's why I have my own ideas - but without a doubt, she understands all of the latest trends better than many (Erofeev also very knowledgeable man, but, unlike the Tar Baby, is not particularly writing).
Here is my modest contribution to help you find the answer to the tantalizing question you are

[Евгений]

LCR, at the expense of pop art does not agree, at the expense of sots-art part, but everyone has their mnenie.Tem more I just art dealer (art dealer).

Сообщение от LCR

to help you find the answer to the tantalizing question you are

The main question was not answered, Mikhail Roginsky? Sots-art, pop art, or simply social realism?
Good article on Michael Roginsky
  http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...985&page=7
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
The most important thing in the works Roginsky and here I agree with Kovalev (http://old.russ.ru/krug/20000820_kov-pr.html)
"... in its principle a serious attitude and to the thing itself, and to engage in art ..."

[color="# 666686"]Posted by 51 minutes[/color]
LCR, I read another article (on torchestve Mikhail Roginsky) and realized response, we will not find their questions .. shoot ...
http://www.guelman.ru/culture/review...01/view_print/