|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #11 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 03.06.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 5,170
Спасибо: 14,182
Поблагодарили 6,377 раз(а) в 1,656 сообщениях
Репутация: 13104
|
I (subjectively, of course) think that a good picture - it is not "frozen time" (I hate that cliche!), But she is that exists in time, or perhaps out of time, but certainly not in a single time point, as well as a good painting. It seems to me that in any kind of art associated with the movement of a priori, be it dancing, cinema, video art or body art, while playing an active role in influencing the audience, so they can not, in principle, to compare, say, with a sculpture or painting .
|
|
|
|
| Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Allena за это полезное сообщение: | Синица (11.03.2009) |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #12 | |
|
Старожил
Регистрация: 09.12.2008
Адрес: Москва, Жуковский
Сообщений: 671
Спасибо: 1,763
Поблагодарили 720 раз(а) в 167 сообщениях
Репутация: 1199
|
Цитата:
![]() ![]() Expand the definition of video art I can not - must be read or think too much. I have a painting does not understand. Do not always know how to distinguish good art from the weak. And if the "more detail", then "other means" - in contrast to the painting, which solves the problem of plastic (light, color, composition) through the canvas and paint - a moving picture, set up a camera and computer. Even if this cartoon. "other purposes" - as opposed to painting which pleases (or care) eyes and feeling - excite the brain. At least, in the examples cited by you, "exposure to the power of the senses - through the brain. This "literariness" is not less than sots.realizm and itinerants. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Похожие темы
|
||||
| Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
| Pablo Picasso in the London National Gallery | Marina56 | Exhibitions and events | 0 | 25.02.2009 04:54 |
| The calf in formaldehyde for 19 million USD It goes without saying ... | Евгений | Art Kaleidoscope | 61 | 24.09.2008 03:15 |
|
|