Kandinsky?

[fabosch]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

well, what-no, but a feeling!
>

Please take a look, and what you feel about this job:

Is this a test for sensitivity?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от fabosch

Is this a test for sensitivity?

In my view, there is no qualitative difference is not ...


And then, and another - the same plohoe.


Or, rather, - NO.

[uriart]

artman,

sergejnowo, these pictures remind me of the baby name - kalyaki-Malaki!

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от fabosch; 2403461"

Is this a test for sensitivity ?

No, not in the least check.
Interested in ordinary sense of perception.

The work of the local museum , the Kunsthalle in Hamburg.
Drove to the museum visitors come to this work , proudly announced, here's a ... Kandyan .
Examines and treats people with ehidtsey me ... Shosh and then painted ?

I know from experience , his cheeks puff out and I have no sense attendant answer - oh , we do not understand .... >
Here's a plate of this work:

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от sergejnowo; 2403731 '

interest in the ordinary sense of perception .

That's it , that 's ordinary .
And with regard to Comrade . Kandinsky must have extraordinary senses to convince myself of some things.

Like what? for me it's always been a mystery .
As the phenomenon of Kandinsky.
Completely third-rate artist, Petrovicheva level at best ...

[uriart]

Igor Guryev, I can not imagine the feelings you need to have to understand that!



"If you have to explain, you do not need to be told!"

Z.N.Gippius