Icon of castings help to assess the authenticity of

[dmitrys]

Welcome and I hope to help.

The icon is declared as :
Our Lady Joy of All Who Sorrow , 18th century , rare R - 7!
The inscription is not engraved , and the cast of the convex !
Natural patina !
The guarantee of authenticity !
Razmer-132/83

Got it and I like it too well, like fresh . Follow up question ?
PS I have tea in the case.

Thank you.

[redbor]

In the view-there is nothing criminal, casting is not loose, no shells.

Declared in accordance with the directory ..

Well-preserved 18th-century icon for.

For me so - all O.K!

But, of course, you can ask someone more seasoned eye on it.

The forums mednolita or Christianity in the art.

[dmitrys]

Here's a nice Save and strained, both in terms of a common minimum wear and tear, and in terms of patina are all very very nice.
Another two confirmed and will sleep peacefully.

[tivat]

Originally Posted by dmitrys

Here's a nice Save and strained, both in terms of a common minimum wear and tear, and in terms of patina are all very very nice.
Another two confirmed and will sleep peacefully.

I see
patina [/URL], casting a weak, a lot of shells.
Replica (IMHO).
Good luck.

[dmitrys]

Originally Posted by tivat

I can see
patina[/URL], casting a weak, a lot of shells.
Replica (IMHO).
Good luck.

this banter or serious?
Although the artificial patina of a thought, that's just the experience to identify extremely small.

[Pecheneg]

Originally Posted by dmitrys; 2171731"

Our Lady Joy of All Who Sorrow , 18th century , rare R - 7!
The inscription is not engraved , and the cast of the convex !
Natural patina !
Guarantee authenticity !

Icon true .. I would lip on the 18th century is not rolled , I would attribute it to the 19th century. , Rarity can not see , and as povodela , too , the plot is one of the most extended ones ... Small parts swollen , which is probably a copy of the already finished casting.
IMHO.

[tivat]

Originally Posted by Pecheneg

Icon true .. I would lip on the 18th century is not rolled , I would attribute it to the 19th century. , Rarity can not see , and as povodela , too , the plot is one of the most extended ones ... Small details swollen that is likely to have a copy of the finished casting.
IMHO .

dmitrys, Pecheneg, it is painted , it shows. Been doing , of course, makes no sense , but the remake looks like. Here the 19th century :
№ 2

[Pecheneg]

Originally Posted by tivat; 2172121 ']it is painted, it can be seen.[/QUOTE]

As for the color does not argue, can be bad .... I see ..

[QUOTE="tivat; 2172121

to remake it seems.

What is the meaning of fool's head with the remakes, if the 19th century in the original missing?

[tivat]

Originally Posted by Pecheneg

As for the color does not argue, can be bad .... I see ..

What is the meaning of fool's head with the remakes, if the 19th century in the original enough?

Chiparusa why pour?
Sell ​​...

[redbor]

Originally Posted by "tivat; 2172121 '

That's the 19th century:

Quotations.
Number 2

This is very different model.
1-I with the engraved letters, 2-I do not tops.
And so, as in the subject line - manufactured in the 18th century, much rarer, and price, respectively, above.
 
Catalog Number: V04-042