eBay - supplier of counterfeit

[dedulya37]

Note for beginners and experienced.
Detected another work attributed to the brush Stozharov VF and not having any relation to him.
Picture posted on the auction eBAY seller "lazark".
This is not the first work he exhibited under the name Stozharov.
Among you, forum, there are specialists who can distinguish the creative handwriting of different artists. I hope you see this fake and verify the correctness of this statement.
Attribution of motives are the same as in the previous "discovery".

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...link:middle:us

[ottenki_serogo]

"mess" of trees and sky - literate artists do not write

[Glasha]

... Obviously, do not go to the doctor ...

[Red Art]

Originally Posted by OlgaV

It's funny ...
It would seem that the quality fakes should grow with time and experience ...

eBay littered primitive falshakami: Russian avant-garde. Vendors from Lithuania and Bulgaria. This stuff is easily sold for $ 9 - $ 1000.

[Allena]

Dear Grandpa! Do not think bore, but back to the topic of reason. The artist is clearly demanded by the market, counterfeit batches appear - and buy them. Let's not well-known side of organizational issues, but whether there is a general possibility of a reason? Heritage VF Stozharov, as I understand it, is very large, but still less than, for example, the legacy of Marc Chagall ...

[dedulya37]

Originally Posted by Allena

Is there a possibility of a reason?

Theoretically, the possibility exists, I think about it.

Originally Posted by Allena

but still smaller than, for example, the legacy of Marc Chagall ...

And what is the legacy of Marc Chagall in specific numbers?

Originally Posted by Allena

fake bundles appear - and buy them.

That's so they do not appear and you have no fear to buy falshak I publish such a permission to say "Stozharov. Enjoy! This time, the seller - "zatekyan", guarantees the absolute authenticity.

[Mihail]

Originally Posted by dedulya37

Theoretically, the possibility exists, I think about it.

And what is the legacy of Marc Chagall in specific numbers?

That's so they do not appear and you have no fear to buy falshak I publish such a permission to say "Stozharov. Enjoy! This time, the seller - "zatekyan", guarantees the absolute authenticity.

Why such a good sketch sign Stozharov?? Yes vobschem clear-for the money. Recently Stozharov name sounds, but my friends, so vividly written, as in this sketch - he could not, even so, his "excessive decoration, literature, and the falseness of the color does not make it to the highest number of artists in 20. Therefore, the last sketch better than many Stozharovskih works and it is important to understand that a little more understanding of the painting, not only in the prices of its ......

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by Mihail

So the last sketch better than many Stozharovskih works and it is important to understand that a little more understanding of the painting,

Michael, is discussed in this posting is not the quality of painting VF Stozharov (this is an outstanding professional painter, whose history has already acknowledged, it is classic).
Discuss fufel, which causes great harm to the artist's heritage and methods of combat (in particular the publication of information in inete on specialized forums, etc.)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Mihail

So the last sketch better than many Stozharovskih works and it is important to understand that a little more understanding of the painting, not only in the prices of its ......

Etude good, but I share your enthusiasm they can not. We have Stozharov sketches, really working material, the instantaneous "reportage" straight job, where are all the talent of his pictures.

Originally Posted by Mihail

Stozharov name sounds, but my friends, so vividly written, as in this sketch - he could not, even so, his "excessive decoration, literature, and the falseness of the color does not make it to the highest number of painters 20 in.

But it surprises me at all to read. You seem to be an artist, but you can see, in my opinion, what is not.
"Excessive decorative, literary and falsehood in color", can argue with that, but I will not, because just look at the pictures Stozharov to understand the futility of such a dispute.
I mean pictures do not even want to listen, my eye missing. I look at them. And there is nothing close to your definition there can not see.
I think that your profession is in this case you do not help, but on the contrary, does not allow an objective look at the painting Stozharov. What exactly does, I can only guess ... But I'm afraid, my guess, close to the truth.

[Veronic]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

But it surprises me at all to read. You seem to be an artist, but you can see, in my opinion, what is not.
"Excessive decorative, literary and falsehood in color", can argue with that, but I will not, because just look at the pictures Stozharov to understand the futility of such a dispute.
I mean pictures do not even want to listen, my eye missing. I look at them. And there is nothing close to your definition there can not see.
I think that your profession is in this case you do not help, but on the contrary, does not allow an objective look at the painting Stozharov. What exactly does, I can only guess ... But I'm afraid, my guess, close to the truth.

Cyril, and there is nothing surprising about the artist very often determines another artist as a competitor. hence the criticism.

A Stozharau very interesting artist, his talent can be seen immediately.