Graphics "amateur"

[Moriakoff]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

and the intelligence to answer questions like: "ZAChEMmmm?" Who's to blame?
What to do (and then with it)?

To these questions are answered NGChernyshevsky and Lenin in similar work!
>

[zarajara]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

Well, probably yes . In general, intelligence is responsible for more common sense , and talent - a natural expression of their desires and skills .

Intelligence - it is different . There are smart people , and is - canny >. And here - intelligence? No wonder that intellectuals in the home often can not cope with simple situations.

[L-ana64110]

Talent Intelligence + = relevant, contemporary artist.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

Talent Intelligence + = relevant, contemporary artist .

This equation works only occasionally, and quite possible other options > >
Actual artist=Talent Intelligence
Actual artist = Intellect Talent
Current hodozhnik = - ( Talent + Int)

But I would like more of a dilettante. It is generally quite a difficult problem in the art and science. With science will be easier , say in physics, has long been no dilettantes . But once were .
They were and are in technology
They are many in the art .
In my opinion art amateur (this not on Contemporary ) features special thoroughness . Always seems to the layman , if you draw all the details , you can achieve perfection , and the parts are poorly connected to each other. Recount and draw all the cilia , but not notice that one eye is higher than the other . But even if an amateur is really talented and good design , and everything is in place , all the same thoroughness - it's like a birthmark - forever.

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от zarajara

This equation works only occasionally, and quite possible other options > >
Actual artist = Talent Intelligence
Actual artist = Intellect Talent
Current hodozhnik = - ( Talent + Int)

But I would like more of a dilettante. It is generally quite a difficult problem in the art and science. With science will be easier , say in physics, has long been no dilettantes . But once were .
They were and are in technology
They are many in the art .
In my opinion art amateur (this not on Contemporary ) features special thoroughness . Always seems to the layman , if you draw all the details , you can achieve perfection , and the parts are poorly connected to each other. Recount and draw all the cilia , but not notice that one eye is higher than the other . But even if an amateur is really talented and good design , and everything is in place , all the same thoroughness - it's like a birthmark - forever .

Interesting observation ! Can you give some examples of such rigor ?

[L-ana64110]

"Dilettante, The one who is engaged in a science or art without special training, not having in-depth knowledge."
in 1992 by a glossary.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

Interesting observation ! Can you give some examples of such rigor ?

 For obvious reasons I know some artists in Armenia, unfortunately , did not find their work online, but here such as:
Author , which started this topic Karapetyan
And here is the "off " - the work of Valentin Podpomogov

[zarajara]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

" dabbler , one who is engaged in a science or art without special training , not having in-depth knowledge . " in 1992 by a glossary .

This is not so , knowledge of an amateur any more depth , much deeper than those who have something a professional finish. But they are one-sided and fragmentary . For example , from art history , he will know just what he likes, but will know all about it.

[Самвел]

Here is the schedule too amateur.
Grant Hosrovyan.

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от Samvel

Here is the schedule too amateur. Grant Hosrovyan .

in the classical education has always taught that an amateur - it does not mean bad , stupid, not educated, developed one-sidedly. Amateur - someone who is only the beginning of a career path . Amateur may be an expert , can not have education, but to have such an eye that is not the pros . Be a cheerleader - means to have open the way for development. Man in the search.