Face of modern painting in Ukraine

[Вивьен]

[NATA NOVA]

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Yaya

Grigory, because it was originally proposed by theme poisterit on what the goats Chichkan with Roytb.

Originally Posted by Konstantin

funny to read about the problems in the art of Ukraine for two people.

In fairness, I would personally not in any case not put those two (very different-sized) number of artists .. What was supposed Comrade Yurko, I do not know, but I have a feeling that they do not slizhkom great friends in life (not in mentality, nor on spirituality), here is my IMHO!

[Вивьен]

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Vivien

That's what he says about this artist

It is amusing comments:
"Yesterday I was at the Louvre. After viewing the masterpieces, paintings seem Roitburd sketches of the artist-amateur. However, the last paragraph of this interview to explain as. Skill of great artists who enjoy and entertain - it is" fascism "..."
 "Myttsyam besides money purely to reporters popontovatsya do not need anything. They have all those Armenians who is a Jew, who is Ukrainian, a Russian who RAGULYA. Would not have been, would have kept together, formed a mentorship environment has long been to Europe. But prefer - lick ragulskih oligarchs, and they're not fools, in Europe and traveled quickly realized Ukrainian art and international, as they say in Odessa Roytburd - two big differences. "

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[Fed]

Because everyone has one does not "stupid" - "clever Roitburd. Thanks for the good interview."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Fed, why on this forum quoted people away from the arts and the culture, as I see it? You in an argument they are needed, such as-"the voice of the people"?
Such methods and such "arguments" all gone through it ...

Added after 1 minute

Originally Posted by Fed

"clever Roitburd. Thanks for the good interview."

Is it not a good interview?

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzranskiy

Is it not a good interview?

Interviews good facts and ease of language, but there are a lot of conclusions, ambiguous, in my opinion. A lot of them, and somehow trust because they lost.
 For example, - "The native is afraid of the artist." But the artists in the mass-townsfolk still those.
   About Savadov-parent sense ...
"The native art requires a comfortable, asexual and conflict ..." I just think that would be more Savadov townsfolk came to stare, pohihikat than comfortable.
"Firstly, because not very high culture of the population, and secondly, due to the fact that most of our customers - people who have money in the first generation and began his career as a not very educated." Therefore, the market of contemporary art in its infancy?