"Black Square" by Malevich: who feels that, looking at this picture

[Jasmin]

With so-what that way ...
His Will, as we play

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Maroussia

A. Sarabyanov - School for Scandal
http://rutube.ru/tracks/1503479.html
     

"Roller deleted" ...

Added after 12 minutes
http://damirmuratov.ru/
(Sorry for the Offtopic)

[klimvor]

Yu Tolstoy (Moscow)

[artist]

Originally Posted by Veronic

I think that the "black box" Malevich - a masterpiece ... Personally, I see in this work the symbol technological revolution .... Malevich foresaw where humanity will grow, and brilliantly showed this square.

And as you know it ... "

I allow myself to just two opinions, or rather one opinion and one impression)
1. opinion.
I can not take Kazemir Severinovich great (brilliant) artist. I understand that humanity is not on my side, but I will try briefly to argue. Still, the greatness of the author provides for his professionalism (this is not a sufficient condition, of course, but necessary). Many amateurs, buy and sell in the past century, and did not give a single "Great." Price High was given, and the Great - no.

What we have in the beginning and a little more then a COP? A weak imitation, trying to survive another man's long experienced impression.
What we have on top? Cheka (I did not include a strip of their arguments amusing texts of the COP. Sometimes they are talented, but we are - about the fine). Theory did not save the COP and he was "brilliant" does not understand that he created. With all the significant impact on out. Art of the Cheka, the author, he also - a theorist, he did not understand. For further continued figachit useless (except, of course, segogodnyashnih art dealers, colored and achromatic geometric shapes. And this is putting such a point?
Not professionally. Trite not vehal. While saying a great deal, but the case that "words matter ..."

2. impression (contrary ... or not).
The end of perestroika, the year I couldnt, in the Tretyakov Gallery, in the Crimea, one of the many then "painting the beginning of the twentieth century" ... decoration traditionally - red, sacking, employment soar ... Cheka in the center ...
I look at it from a distance of four meters. Next, with the same distance he considers simpatishnaya girl. Enjoying silence. Gaze! Then look at each other and I say:
- What it seems to me: what is he ....
- And it seems to me. something is wrong ... - Meet me pretty girl.
We are approaching the work, and a piece of paper, pinned to the sacking beneath the Cheka, reads: "... the author's repetition of"

Thus here)))
I take this opportunity to convey greetings to all who knows me and all the cute girls!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by artist

We are approaching the work, and a piece of paper, pinned to the sacking beneath the Cheka, we read:" ... the author's repetition of "

So what? They are now 4 pieces. known.
Malevich created several versions of "Black Square". All known versions of "Squares", written by Malevich from 1915 to early 1930's, "the development of one theme. They differ not only in sequence and year of creation, but also the color, design and texture.
 But the author never copied the "always created a new version.
"Copyright repeat" ... So what?

[artist]

not "torknulo "))))

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by artist

not "torknulo "))))

And, it ...
Well, well ...
I, for one, long look at the Crimean Cheka can not: "torkoet" really is not very childish, and just "stomps" and "sausage" ...

[Маруся]

Originally Posted by artist

Still, the greatness of the author provides for his professionalism (this is not a sufficient condition, of course, but necessary). Many laymen to buy and sell in the past century, and did not give any "Great". Price High was given, and the Great - no.

Dear Artist,
In connection with your "opinion" question of professionalism:
Professional artist - who is this? Who earns a living, or even if you can not make money - still lives her profession? Or someone who has a degree of professional school?
I hope you know that none of the first names of Russian avant-garde never finished either AX or MUZHVZ: some - were driven out, someone would go himself because of academic boredom, not to mention the "amateur", which are both nowhere and not adopted and those who never go there and did not treat ...
How can that be? Remove the epithet "great" and leave "expensive sold?
And, for example, Van Gogh? Or is it too you is "impression": that "what is he ..." not a professional?

[uriart]

Maroussia, That's Van Gogh, me personally, very impressive.
And the KGB did well!
Do you want and I'll draw this?

[Маруся]

Originally Posted by uriart

Do you want and I'll draw this?

Yuri! Of course I want!
You know how warmly I am to you, so your version will accept with pleasure!
But, believe me, to draw a "black box" must be Malevich, Malevich and if not, then we ought to be first, ie The first who theoretically reduced art to simple geometric forms and the whole color spectrum expressed in two: the color and no color.