Продам: "Portrait of a Man" artist AD Kivshenko

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от ksp

I respect, including and your personal opinion, but I want to point out that we should consider himself a serious professional, so that the small photos to make such a conclusion and to question the research professionals who are confirmed not only the authorship, but also during the creation ...

see below

What can I say.
I am also a specialist.

And even a small picture shows that between this work and the works of Comrade. Kivshenko do nothing there.

The painting was done in a single layer, frankly unfinished, I would say that she wrote after 1895, when he died Kivshenko.

[ksp]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Yes as you say.
I am also a specialist.
And even a small picture shows that between this work and the works of Comrade. Kivshenko do nothing there.
The painting was done in a single layer, frankly unfinished, I would say that she wrote after 1895, when he died Kivshenko.

propose to confirm your viability as a specialist (do not know the truth, what ..?), at its own expense, to re-examination of this picture in Grabar, TG, and if that is not so, ie authorship is confirmed, you will pay me all this related, material costs ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от ksp

propose to confirm your viability as a specialist (do not know the truth, what ..?), at its own expense, re-examination of this picture in Grabar, TG, and if that is not so, ie authorship is confirmed, you will pay me all this related, material costs ...

I have nothing to anyone going to prove.

I saw some expertise from the Tretyakov Gallery and Grabar, with whom I disagree and I can refute.

I do not believe any examinations, I have my own head is.

In general, if you want, ask fellow moderator to remove my posts from this branch, if they can prevent you.

[ABC]

Сообщение от ksp

propose to confirm your viability as a specialist (do not know the truth, what ..?), at its own expense, re-examination of this picture in Grabar, TG, and if that is not so, ie authorship is confirmed, you will pay me all this related, material costs ...

should not apply to these conclusions as to the ultimate truth

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, for example, the manner of writing his beard, complete absence of tonal elaboration, that it is impossible to have Kivshenko.

Look at how many colors made the lower part of his beard.

So do not write then.

This coloring and drawing seem to be made "in a lively, clear, direct oil, even smear.

In Kivshenko still somehow land used to linearly improved.

I did not insist on anything, but I doubt that this is the second half of the 19 century.

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And even a small picture shows that between this work and the works of Comrade. Kivshenko do nothing there.

The painting was done in a single layer, frankly unfinished, I would say that she wrote after 1895, when he died Kivshenko.

I have no reason to doubt the expertise of timing. I do not see in this picture is nothing that would cause to the contrary. For photos picture I like. It may even be the author, indeed, Kivshenko. Why, in fact, no? And then we must look "alive". But watch "live" must always be!

[ksp]

Сообщение от ABC

should not apply to these conclusions as to the ultimate truth

possible, "... but others do not ...".

You can, of course, and for photography, but if the person will get ...

this work is concluded Museum, where there are several works by the artist and it is possible to study objectively and in comparison ...

Posted by Igor Guriev
... Ask fellow moderator to remove my posts from this branch ...

why?
does not bother me, and the proposal I want to uphold ...