Traders?

[Seriy]

NATA NOVA, I immediately hung up on their site and a lot of people looked at it and was delighted.
Pavel, Giotto-a great artist, but because of the Petrov-Vodkin I hardly look at him.

Looking back at the history of art, perhaps yes, gallery owners and dealers are to blame in many ways.
They reported, there would be no Tretyakov, there would be no end of Russian painting of 19 th century.
Not Shchukin-Morozov from wherever there was a Russian avant-garde?

And I look at our gallery owners, well and whom they brought into light in earnest?
hyped the global level, as Shapovalov unwound Tattoo? that the millions poured. Nobody. I am afraid that they do not understand what art is.
Here the artist is already being discussed and there, and here, and it does not go to the West.
I'm for it to become a star. But she did not you become. Well, find someone with the thread of this concept, so that worked. No, that's pots with reinforcement-everything for us.
Yes they have seen at least once a student's annual show in any College of Art in Europe? There, an ordinary student will shut up the belt of all our kontempor artists together. Namely, these grow our gallery. Unpromising. Hopeless. Gray and miserable. Russian poor. And miserable.

[AlexanderG]

Originally Posted by Seriy

They reported, there would be no Tretyakov, there would be no end of Russian painting of 19 th century.
Not Shchukin-Morozov from wherever there was a Russian avant-garde?

Oni, po sovremennym poniatiiam, oligarhi


And I look at our gallery owners, well and whom they brought into light in earnest?

Dlia etogo nuzen soiuz s muzeiami i kapitalom. Ni i dal'she so vsemi po spisku. Nuzna tselenapravlennaia programma i ee metodicheskoe ispolnenie. Vremennoi faktor tak ze vazen God - dva nedostatochno.

[Peter]

Originally Posted by Seriy

NATA NOVA,
 
I'm for it to become a star. But she did not you become. .

Give "American Idol" for the artists! Production center, etc.

[AlexanderG]

Originally Posted by Peter

Give "American Idol" for the artists! Production center, etc.

Mozet prosto aktivnuiu galereiu ?

[Pavel]

Giotto, a great artist, but because of the Petrov-Vodkin I hardly look at him.
I do not understand. If not hard to explain?

[Seriy]

Pavel, in my childhood I liked Petrov-Vodkin, these Petrograd Madonna. Then, when I became acquainted with the early Renaissance, including Giotto and then realized that he just picked up their style, palette and moved to his material. But since childhood impressions are very strong, but now my early Renaissance strongly commends Vodkin.

 Alexander, after a grand exhibition in the garage, many were wondering, but why our gallery owners are inefficient, China, Malaysia, India, half of the developing world is present in kontempor lists of successful artists. It is not just about money. Shapovalov made a tattoo on a penny at world prices, it is all told in detail. He had a working idea, understanding that the public needed flair. Later composers, poets, singers - all worked on the general idea.
 Recently, in a well-respected well-known publicist Learn sounded a similar theme, he accused the country's leading fotogalerista that she knows nothing about photography. Therefore promotes appropriate gloomy and hopeless artists.
 Of course, the artist himself has to think, as a creative unit.
But after reading an incredible series of publications LCR of the German Expressionist Blue Horseman and all the vanguard of the first third of the 20 th century, I have approved the opinion that they all worked like a swarm of bees, all borrowed from each other in an open, enriched - subjects, composition , a palette-all passed from artist to artist, enriched and returned back into the general treasury. And Kandinsky and Picasso, they were not lonely rock, they were one of many. And I am sure that if Picasso sometimes indistinguishable from Leger or the marriage is the normal creative process.
Therefore, if the gallery owners and curators are not literate and will not offer the life-giving trend, then the artist alone is unlikely that he would do.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Seriy

Pavel, in my childhood I liked Petrov-Vodkin, these Petrograd Madonna. Then, when I became acquainted with the early Renaissance, including Giotto and then realized that he just picked up their style, palette and moved to his material. But since childhood impressions are very strong, but now my early Renaissance strongly commends Vodkin.

 Alexander, after a grand exhibition in the garage, many were wondering, but why our gallery owners are inefficient, China, Malaysia, India, half of the developing world is present in kontempor lists of successful artists. It is not just about money. Shapovalov made a tattoo on a penny at world prices, it is all told in detail. He had a working idea, understanding that the public needed flair. Later composers, poets, singers - all worked on the general idea.
 Recently, in a well-respected well-known publicist Learn sounded a similar theme, he accused the country's leading fotogalerista that she knows nothing about photography. Therefore promotes appropriate gloomy and hopeless artists.
 Of course, the artist himself has to think, as a creative unit.
But after reading an incredible series of publications LCR of the German Expressionist Blue Horseman and all the vanguard of the first third of the 20 th century, I have approved the opinion that they all worked like a swarm of bees, all borrowed from each other in an open, enriched - subjects, composition , a palette-all passed from artist to artist, enriched and returned back into the general treasury. And Kandinsky and Picasso, they were not lonely rock, they were one of many. And I am sure that if Picasso sometimes indistinguishable from Leger or the marriage is the normal creative process.
Therefore, if the gallery owners and curators are not literate and will not offer viviparous trend, then the artist alone is unlikely that he would do.

You're right. Without a tradition (or deeper levels) nothing happens. And Saving tendetsiya - is nonsense

[Seriy]

artcol, replaced in the life-giving.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Seriy

artcol, replaced in the life-giving.

No, I mean that life-giving and the tendency of a number of different words.
It's like saying God's a brick!
Or - a beautiful stump!

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Seriy

And I'm sure that if Picasso sometimes indistinguishable from Leger or the marriage is the normal creative process.

All right, you only need to insert a dash: ... A Iksigona from Picasso ... ;-)