Winery, the exhibition Andrew Krasulina

[ama]

Andrew Krasulina know from childhood, he was friendly and worked with my uncle , sculptor A. Theological . Skillfully managed with a tree, doing interesting work in bronze ... But in his old age has moved in aktualschikov : something squeezes , cuts , invents , install ... Entered the room with a bias - another dress naked king. But started taking pictures and making a frame -by-frame , I realized that this is not just distribute - suspended - is highlighted , not just because! For all the seemingly accidental exposure began to emerge the idea of the artist. Create a space where the object and the shadow of it, equal , and sometimes the shadow is more important, more meaningful ... As a child , when you look at the night shadows of the trees on the ceiling, you can not see the trees themselves , and the shadows - that they move , change shape , scare your reality ...
Hall plunged into darkness , light sources placed in the exact locations for the creation of shadow and highlight the most amount ... People trapped in this space , lose their materiality , turn into black silhouettes and ... become part of the exhibition ...

[Maskit]

May show, as a whole , and failed, but all of these solutions have been repeatedly addressed and of the naked king you remembered not by accident. However, holding a master worthy even when tens of years trying to learn the stool or kompeliruet works of other artists - the same Kudryashov , but worth a look in the folder to the figurative drawing and all at once falls into place , and just as you remember Andersen, but the wife it is a really good writer, and her money , he wrote his story with dignity .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

So Ulitskaya can after 5 years to stop reading at all, and stool Krasulina by then, you see, and "shoot".

[Maskit]

Cyril , you or , as always, do not understand or , as always, prikidyvaetes.Delo not that what money and who like to live, but that would be a particular artist is known , if not proplachennymi , doroguschie exhibition in the Russian Museum and the etc.. , thick and deshovye albums , a solid public relations , communications, relatives and so on. I do not in any way anything against Andrew does not have - I do not even have four of his work, just be honest and objectively reflect, and all on the subject.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Maskit

It's not about what money and who both live

Yes?

So I just do not understand you correctly in this part of your message:

Originally Posted by Maskit

and with her money he ably paints his tale.

Sorry, apparently, the words "money" I dreamed.
>

[Maskit]

Cyril , I repeat for you, of course I understand the other , that it is not about the welfare of the household , I do not care about it , and that the example Krasulina, clearly shows the role of investments in the family name for the promotion of the artist. With family point of view this is the right and decent thing, but for the history of art in Russia, although this phenomenon is widespread, but it is very harmful.

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Maskit

this phenomenon although common, but very harmful.

Interesting continuation of the story about the exhibition.

Maskit, and that is not bad, in your opinion, for the history of art development in Russia?

[Maskit]

Many deserving artists for their creativity vie gallery and they will set an example to develop all facets of our art, and all kinds of soap puziri , whose work for the viewer ends with the death of a rich relative or break a relationship with him , confuses and slows down our ability to promote artists. who remembers , for example, the artist Ivan Novozzhenova , whose wife is a banker pays him the best places in the Art- Moscow, and after her divorce from her nonstandard and , for all intents and similar examples of mass. Not bad now , but it is, believe me, much to many people.

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Maskit; 2469701"

vie for their creativity gallery

At this point it would be good for anyone with an example and what galleries. Quite the opposite in my artists are queuing to galleries that have themselves to do something not so.

Originally Posted by Maskit; 2469701."

Who remembers, for example, the artist Ivan Novozzhenova

Well themselves and answer to your question, the harm if no one remembers? Without the "quality" of how much money they spend on promotion nothing will. And who remembers, I answer - the owners where the exhibition halls, they also need to live. have the desire to spend money on the exhibition so be it, just do not harm. No cultural level is not lower, lower by and large nothing.
And the few who are interested, and follow - will understand, do not worry.
I spent yesterday out auction of contemporary art in the Multimedia Art Museum in the first place was pleasantly surprised by the huge queue in the dressing room, especially young people under 30 . so all is not as bad as it seems. Vparit bullshit those who go to museums and exhibitions - will not work, and the Provisional Government bullshit those who do not go - will not work all the more.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Maskit

Who remembers, for example, the artist Ivan Novozzhenova, whose wife is a banker pays him the best seats at Art Moscow

And who in a few years will remember the other artists who places on the Art Moscow paid no wife, bankers, and others his uncle, who tried to promote these artists?