Russian art in the basement of the Louvre

[Тютчев]

Russian art in the basement of the Louvre

The world-renowned artist Eric Bulatov told Izvestia on modern painting

Yuri Kovalenko

October 14 at the Louvre presents an exhibition "Counterpoint: Russian contemporary art." The exhibition presents works of more than twenty artists. This is Erik Bulatov, Ilya Kabakov Emilia and Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid, Valery Koshlyakov, Alexei Kallima, Vladimir Dubosarsky and Alexander Vinogradov, Andrei Monastery, Vadim Zakharov, Yuri Leiderman, Yuri Albert, Avdyei Ter-Oganyan, the group "Blue Noses" and AES + F, and others. On the eve of opening day with Academician Erik Bulatov in his Paris studio, met "Izvestia" correspondent in France, Yuri Kovalenko.

News: None of the Russian artists during his lifetime was not present at the Louvre. Yes and Western masters, award-an honor, once or twice and obchelsya. In short, go to the Louvre - it's cool!

Erik Bulatov: Indeed, the Louvre seems to us all something unattainable. But our show will be like in the basement - in the medieval Louvre, where the excavated foundation walls and towers of the palace. This place is absolutely unsuitable for display. There isn't what you can do the installation or display video. In the present exhibition, which would have to say about the current state of our art - especially in the Year of Russia in France, should arrange elsewhere. For example, the National Centre for Arts and Culture Georges Pompidou.

and: So, are you offended?

bulat: I'm not mad, but just did not want was euphoria, excessive enthusiasm: "Oh, the Louvre, the Louvre!" But be that as it may be, for us, Russian, the Louvre - a sacred place to which we partake. Suppose somewhere in a corner in the gap.

and: Does the holding of "Counterpoint" recognition of our modern art? Or is it just one of the events in the cross of the Year of Russia and France?

bulat: This question I ask myself. There are signs, and of both. On the one hand, the West has long existed a belief that the Russian art, not counting the avant-garde 1920's, is not there. Everything else - before and after - the provincial and secondary. Of course, three or four of our artists have been recognized, but their success has remained private and not transferred to the Russian art in general. On the other hand, is going - albeit very slowly - the approval process for Russian art as a whole.

and: To what extent is the current exhibition at the Louvre reflects contemporary Russian art?

Читать дальше... 

bulat: It is based largely on conceptualism - towards which the Louvre will be presented convincingly enough. But it's not all our art. The result is not an objective picture, but a fragment. Many artists that I seem very important at this show are missing. I think, for example, Oscar Rabin had necessarily to be invited.

and: The audience is waiting for surprises. On the day of opening day at the Louvre artist Yuri Leiderman organizes his performance: two women in the Russian national costumes in front of spectators otshinkuyut hundred cabbages. For his part, his colleague Yuri Albert will hold viewers Louvre blindfolded ...

bulat: That this is our conceptualism.

and: The poster exhibition is reproduced your picture "Liberte" ("Freedom") - roll with the famous Delacroix painting "Liberty on the barricades."

bulat: The display two of my work. In addition to this, still picture of "Black night - snow white."

and: "Liberte" - painting axiomatic in all senses. Together with another of your work - "The Soviet space" - she even went to the French textbooks.

bulat: I got this order in 1989, when France was preparing a big celebration to mark the 200 th anniversary of the revolution. Going to pick up in the air airship, which on the one hand had to paint the Russian artist, and with another - the American one. And I have an idea associated with our revolutionary situation in 1980. There were a lot of freedom-loving illusions.

and: As the Western viewer perceives the Russian art today?

 bulat: Always with interest. I certainly found this at an exhibition "Russian Landscape" at the National Gallery in London. Museum is free, and the exhibition fee. And the people stood to her fall. The same attention to the Russian Exhibition in Paris. The problem arises from the criticism - it is not interesting.

and: And on which side the truth?

bulat: The truth can not be on the side of those trying to lead art. Wrong and assume that it is on the side of the audience. Mass, for example, go to the Glazunov and Shilov. In any case, we must take with the audience, or at least to those who wants to understand painting. They must bring with them to work. Do not just announce one artist good, and another - bad, but to explain things regarding the fundamental principles of art.

and: There is a French expression "to train the eye."

bulat: Not only the eyes but also his head. Eye, as my teacher Vladimir A. Tabor, you can cheat. Consciousness is more difficult to cheat.

and: Tabor was not only an artist but a philosopher.

bulat: He was a philosopher of art. He has been associated with Florensky, and our other religious philosophy. I'm not a philosopher, but simply an artist. I'm just trying to understand why, and why do so and not otherwise.

and: Is it too much power in the hands of the curators have taken, which is called the commissioners? Artists in their hands, for your words, such as auxiliary materials - paints and brushes?

bulat: I have the impression that the overall situation is now changing. Maybe it's because among curators is a generational change.

and: Is it art is not lost on many of its moral function and not become part of the entertainment industry?

bulat: objectively judge the art of today, we can not, because we judge it by what we show. I do not know whether this is consistent with what is happening in the arts. Moreover, I hope it is not so. And about what kind of art today, we learn, maybe in fifty years.

and: future victories in the West, the mass middle-class culture has predicted Herzen. Now it seems to have finally triumphed in Russia.

bulat: She can not win the final. Of course, we do not live in the Renaissance, but art can not perish. If this happens, human existence becomes meaningless. Art asks a question that no one asks: "Why man?".

and: Do you still walk to the Louvre to study the classics. What can study the long-standing well-known artist?

bulat: Actually I have very little know how. Much I did not get.

and: affliction worse than pride?

bulat: No, it's true. Every artist has a trail on which he walks. And if you stumble a little, once you get into the quagmire in which no orientirueshsya altogether. And every time a new job must start from scratch, re-solve, because in art, all decisions are disposable.

and: Do you still tormented creative torments?

bulat: In addition to VAFavorskiy my teacher was Falk. Student I have come to show him their work. And he asked me: "And what you think about them?" Then I was in despair from his own ineptitude and told him about it. Falk replied: "So you're now in a very good creative state. I'll tell you a thing that can not be your consolation, but which come in handy later. This condition will last your whole life. And if it passes, it means you as the artist ran out. " I have never felt so helpless, as now, in old age, when starting a new still life.

and: Next to the works of some great artists in the Tretyakov Gallery or the Louvre you would like to exhibit their paintings?

bulat: In the Louvre - it is terrible to say - with the "Coronation of the Virgin Fra Angelico and titsianovskim" Country Concert ". In the Tretyakov Gallery - with Alexander Ivanov or Levitan. My favorite levitanovskaya painting - "The Lake", which is located in the Russian Museum. It was to be called "Rus", but Levitan hesitate to give this name, considering the picture fails.

and: Why, your Moscow studio hangs a reproduction of the "Mona Lisa"?

bulat: On the "Gioconda" I wrote the article. For me, it is important how to construct this pattern, as shown in the problem boundaries between art and life. It was on this Leonardo worked better than anyone else.

and: But life is still more important than art?

bulat: I really do not know. On the one hand, it is, on the other hand, life - a material for art.

and: After living for nearly two decades in France, you think you are Russian or European artists?

bulat: I am a Russian artist of the upbringing and education. Therefore, I am an artist European, like all artists living in France, Germany or Italy.

and: among your favorite artists - Levitan, Savrasov. Mind they do not understand?

bulat: artists do not affect the mind and the senses. Their art at you or acts instantaneously, or does not work at all. I am convinced that, if it is good to form an exhibition of Russian landscape painting of the XIX century, it will make a huge impression.

and: Once you told me that Levitan and Malevich - it's not polar opposites.

bulat: Because they are both rooted in Russian culture, they certainly are not opposites. They tried to make the audience was part of what they do. Levitan was very important to the viewer - bypassing the painting - at once fell into its landscape, in a birch grove.

and: Could today be a new landscape-level Levitan?

bulat: There is a landscape painter. It Oleg Vasiliev (friend and collaborator Bulatov, with whom they are together for many years was a book designer. - "The News"). He is seen, but is still undervalued.

and: The Brazilian lived Vicente wrote a dozen paintings, which depicted the imagined assassination of George W. Bush, Brazilian President Lula da Silva, the current Pope Benedict XVI. Are all the artists are allowed? Is it acceptable in the art of some kind of censorship?

bulat: External censorship, of course, for art mortal. Must be internal censorship. What is it? Best of all Kant said: "The starry sky above us and the moral law within us." And this law is all we are obliged to observe.

http://www.izvestia.ru/culture/article3146987/

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

None of the Russian artists during his lifetime was not present at the Louvre.

Um ... Well, if Archil Gorky Russian artist, a Ukrainian Jew Sonia Delaunay - 100%Russian


What, though, the idiots are taking a job in the newspaper.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

Um ... Well, if Archil Gorky Russian artist, a Ukrainian Jew Sonia Delaunay - 100%Russian


What, though, the idiots are taking a job in the newspaper.

Are you talking about?
Explain ...

[Евгений]

Tiutchev, in the Louvre was the exhibition "Holy Armenia. Homecoming" were there work Arshile Gorky (in September 2007. All the exhibits of the exhibition "Holy Armenia. Homecoming" were exhibited in the Louvre).

I also do not understand what wrote respected Wladzislaw,

[iside]

bulat: objectively judge the art of today, we can not, because we judge it by what we show. I do not know whether this is consistent with what is happening in the arts. Moreover, I hope it is not so. And about what kind of art today, we learn, maybe in fifty years.

In truth the case.

[Евгений]

Rosokhrankultura still not released a working Avdei Ter-Oganyan at the exhibition "Russian counterpoint to the" opening Oct. 14 at the Louvre, said OpenSpace with a link to the blog of the Director of the Perm Museum of Modern Art Marat Gelman. "Works Avdei Ter-Ohanian at the show, apparently will not," - says Gelman.
  "Three days ago, when I'm so glad proanonsiroval" solution to the problems with the censors, I telephoned Nicolas Shibaev, program manager for the "Year of Russia in France," and said that the leadership of Rosokhrankultura assured him that the ban lifted - writes Gelman. - Today my employee clearly explained - "the signal to lift the ban was not."
  As the publication of the Commissioner-General of Russia in France, Nicolas Shibaev, head of Rosokhrankultura Alexander Kibovsky on Friday, October 1, told him that all of the exhibitors allowed to be exported from Russia. "The response was positive - said Shibaev. - There were no obstacles to the export of these works." The same day, the press service of the Louvre announced, that the exhibition will be held in full .
   Shibaev, which is now in Moscow, was surprised to learn that the work of Ter-Oganyan again not produced abroad: "If something was wrong, I would call from Paris."
   Representatives of Rosokhrankultura were unavailable for comment.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Eugene; 1313911]Rosokhrankultura still not released a working Avdei Ter-Oganyan at the exhibition" Russian counterpoint to the "opening Oct. 14 at the Louvre[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://lenta.ru/news/2010/10/08/kontrapunkt/"] The work of Ter-Oganyan released for exhibition in Paris. [/URL]

[Евгений]

In the Louvre, an exhibition of contemporary Russian art, Ter-Oganyan asked to remove his work
10:10-suffering exhibition "Counterpoint: Contemporary Russian Art" opened in the medieval Louvre, surprising visitors to the museum by dozens of pairs of shoes at the foot of the palace walls, video projections and tangible creations of Russian artists ..
   The official opening will take place on Thursday - on Wednesday she was introduced to reporters. However, a separate hall for modern temporary exhibitions in the Louvre is not provided, and hide the exhibits of the public failed. Therefore, even with the medium, all visitors to the underground level of the museum can witness the nearly 50 works selected by the chief curator and curator of contemporary art exhibitions in the Louvre, Marie-Laure Bernadac.
  "After a major exhibition" Holy Russia in the XI to XVIII Century Louvre wanted to show the present-day Russia. We would like to invite specific representatives of several generations of artists who might respond to our inquiry, which related to or history of a place or a new reading of history Russian art, especially the avant-garde "- Bernadac said at the opening ceremony.
   - Ter-Oganyan asked to remove his pictures from the exhibition

  The curator is not the first time puts contemporary art at the foot of the medieval Louvre, but first these exhibitions took place in the halls of Oriental antiquities, and among the sculptures.
  "We chose the medieval Louvre for several reasons. Firstly, it was difficult to fit into one of the departments of the Louvre, because we do not have the Slavic Department. In addition, the medieval Louvre, with its ruins, archeology seemed to us an ideal platform for contemporary artists," - said the curator.
   Itself Bernadac most admires installation "The End" Vadim Zakharov, video is projected onto the walls of the palace.
  "I love the projection of Vadim Zakharov, since this is a new product. Kabakov Works delicious, but they are already known. Then, as a new product Zakharova - confession of a contemporary artist who goes by the snow, with a virtual fire burning at the foot of the tower, he tells about the current situation artist - an appeal to artists of the modern world, a very strong product, "- said Bernadac agency.
   However, she did not hide the fact that the Louvre Russian artists managed to get through the Year of Russia and France.
   "Otherwise we would not be an exhibition of Russian contemporary art," - says the curator.

Читать дальше... 

recall, two weeks before the opening of the exhibition was that its conduct under the threat of : September 24 there is information that Rosokhrankultura not allowed to export to France, four of Avdei Ter-Oganyan a series of "radical abstraction." Explanation - texts in these works can be perceived as calling for violent change of constitutional system of Russia and inciting national and religious discord.
  Gallerist Marat Gelman wrote in his blog that as a sign of solidarity with the Ter-Oganyan of participation declined to almost half of the participants, "Counterpoint: Yuri Albert, Andrew Monastery, Igor Makarevich, Vitaly Komar, Vadim Zakharov, Yuri Leiderman and Valery Koshlyakov. The exhibition was under threat.
   Louvre week gave no answer, and finally, on 1 October said, that the event will be held within a specified time, and exhibited will all work.
  Marie-Laure Bernadac reported that the Louvre has been fundamental in bringing her to Paris, all selected works. "We said:" We have signed a disclosure and we need the pictures, which are set out in it. "After this issue was discussed NCCA, ministries and embassies in the light of our position," - she said the agency.
  For her, it did not matter whether it works Ter-Oganyan, or any other artist. "You can not sign the agreement and seven months later to say: you do not get these products. They are in a directory of them reported the press, they are necessary for the exhibition. If this exhibition, which was signed by the Ministry, to comply with an agreement or contract is broken," - said the curator.
   Ter-Oganyan asked to remove his pictures from the exhibition
  The opening was not without scandal. From Prague on equity came to Paris by the artist himself Ter-Oganyan, who does not intend to, in his words, "to entertain the French public."
  After the first decision on the Failure of his works, the artist has decided to play "all-in" and posted on his blog two open letters, one addressed to Bernadac. He stated that refuses to "Counterpoint" if the Russian Foreign Ministry did not extend foreign passport living in Bulgaria, artist and filmmaker Oleg Mavromatti. At Mavromatti in 2000 criminal case was opened under the same article that Ter-Oganyan - 282 of the Criminal Code (incitement of national and religious hatred).
  A letter he sent, and most Bernadac to e-mail address which he found on the website the Louvre. But the picture is able to overcome the embargo and the artist, and now the Ter-Oganyan required to remove them from the walls of the Louvre.
  "I came to talk about Mavromatti. I demand to remove these works without paying attention to this problem. I'm not here to entertain the French public. I said that I want to have an hour to speak to it (Bernadac) I introduced that we have a problem. But when he saw me, she turned the press conference, "- he told reporters.
   Louvre with the artist at the root does not agree and certify that the paintings continue to delight audiences.
  "I can not do anything. Neither I nor the Louvre do not solve these problems. An artist can speak freely, to defend human freedom and the freedom of art, and I sympathize with that. But as far as to use the Louvre, to the exhibition and to withdraw his paintings - in this case I do not see much point, "- said Bernadac agency.
  According to her, works of Ter-Oganyan will remain on display until the end - until January 31, 2011, and the artist has the right to remove them without the consent of the administration.
      

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

Um ... Well, if Archil Gorky Russian artist, a Ukrainian Jew Sonia Delaunay - 100%Russian

Wladzislaw, are you talking about? Russian art - it is a myth! HE did not exist and not exist! Aivazovsky - half Armenian, half-Crimean Tatar! Levitan - outstanding representative of the Jewish school of painting! Chagall - Egyptian Pharaohs misdirected to France for the return of ancient relics! Feshin - half Tatar, half redskin! Malevich - Polish nobleman - Talmudist! Deineka - ardent, deeply conspiratorial banderovets recruited Vrubel Pole, who in his time, he was recruited by Gogol (great-great-Trotsky)! Polenov Savrasov, Filonov, etc. - Is also likely some Scythians or Chuvash! Russian was the only Picasso, but it was in the last century, so do not count. And as for the writers, poets, composers, scientists, filmmakers and say nothing! .. One of Dostoevsky and his grandson Eisenstein what cost?! .. Pushkin!? .. Even Pushkin and one - the old kind of Ethiopian African gondoliers! A Russian language? This is the same mate, slang, and "The Tale of Tsar Saltan"! Russian Czars and the Georgian Germans were! And you say, Archil Delaunay - Cosmonaut!

[Art-Galera]

Сообщение от Tiutchev

Russian art in the basement of the Louvre
[SPOILER]bulat: It is based largely on conceptualism - towards which the Louvre will be presented convincingly enough. But it's not all our art. The result is not an objective picture, but a fragment. Many artists that I seem very important at this show are missing. I think, for example, Oscar Rabin had necessarily to be invited.

is about. do not understand why this is insane emphasis on conceptualism. and then here. and the next year in our pavilion at the Venice Biennale and the TA. because it is clearer and more in demand in the West? unlikely. The same monastic said that all texts are translated ... As in the 197-some year .... and that everything will become clear soon ... who are just?