What are the critics?

[Peter]

As an artist and a man who love art, I have often wondered what the critics want? "What they show in their works that are not visible to the eye, what can not be understood looking directly at the work of art? How do their views contribute to the creativity of an artist, but the other puts an end? This subjective view, or attempt an objective analysis of creativity? I would like to hear from the critics and art historians.

[Игорь Гурьев]

What could be simpler?

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist, as well as to express in words how he perceives the art.

That's it.

If a critic - an interesting personality and knows how to write, his texts on art will be interesting and different.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist

This is a task of the historian of art.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

This is a task of the historian of art.

Art historian studies the history of art, and the critic says and informs him about contemporary art.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

expressing their views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between the artist and the spectator mass.

Ideally, the critic should be an ideal spectator, able to express their feelings, rather than "mediator."

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

expressing their views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between the artist and the spectator mass.

Ideally, the critic should be an ideal spectator, able to express their feelings, rather than "mediator."

[Peter]

And what does the ideal audience?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Peter

And what does the ideal audience?

Anyone who understands that art - a kind of revelation of God.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

This is where you learn about this?
A few years of life of the artist of the twentieth century, for example, whether the history of art?
.

At Alexander Abramovich Kamensky, for example.

It was a good critic.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Y Alexander Abramovich Kamensky, for example.

It was a good critic.

Where are you from Kamensky deducted such a distinction between critics and art historians?
Himself Alexander Abramovich, Doctor of Fine Arts and Honored Artist of Russia-positioned as an art critic and art historian.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Himself Alexander Abramovich, Doctor of Fine Arts and Honored Artist of Russia-positioned as an art critic and art historian.

Collection of Articles "Opening day" - is not art history and critical studies.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

collection of his articles "Vernissage" - is not art history and critical studies.

How to say ... "Etude both studies ...

Kamensky, Alexander Abramovich (1922 - 1992).
Vernissage: a collection of scientific papers /A. Kamensky. -. - Moscow: Soviet Artist, 1974
Abstract: This book is made up of individual articles AA Kamensky, on a long line of the greatest masters of the Soviet and prerevolutionary Russian painting, sculpture and graphics. The purpose of AA Kamensky was to create a coherent book with strictly and consistently carried out the general principles of orderly system of aesthetic judgments, with a definite and sound logic guiding ideas. And this book really turned out - all without exception, this collection of articles characterized by the importance and relevance of the analyzed them in the theoretical and historical themes, clever and impressive, with great taste, your choice of artists and their works, as well as genuine and unconditional seriousness and the value associated with these artists range of ideas and thoughts. For artists, art historians and a wide range of readers.

[Peter]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Anyone who understands that art - a kind of revelation of God.

There have been critics who are blamed say Cezanne, then there were others who said that Cezanne fellow, he opened a new view on zhivopis.Kto of them better understand the revelation of God? "That is such an opinion, criticism of fog, for In order to better express those or other group interests, depending on the conjuncture ."