Landscape. Help in the attribution

[Elrick]

Good afternoon.

Here is a picture as the canvas and stretcher - a very old, the origin of the post-war.
Signature I do not inspired by, maybe someone familiar?

Thank you in advance)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Elrick

Signature I do not inspired by, perhaps someone familiar?

Spiridonov?

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Elrick

Signature I do not inspired by, perhaps someone familiar?

Micah.
Spiridonov.
Obviously, Michael.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от U_Z

Micah.
Spiridonov.
Obviously, Michael.

Only not this.

[Elrick]

Thank you. It was the first suggestion , I thought that's the side of this here : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Спиридо..._Spiridonovich
However , the signature does not have anything even close to do with people's artist of Chuvashia. And the way is also not very adequate.
Mikhail Spiridonov - Google knows only about the one who mentioned Cyril in the previous message ...

Threat . The photo is hard to see , over the signature of dating, and most of all to read : 901
ZZY . The post-war origins: it means that the existing of things seems to be known after the war, before that - no. Perhaps , somewhere brought from the front.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Elrick

However, the signature does not have anything even remotely to do with people's artist of Chuvashia.
And the way is not too meets.

The author of your landscape, Moses Spiridonov, of course.

[Elrick]

Approximately 90x60.

Came in an exchange of Borisovny Tatiana Alexandrova.

Accordingly, the "floated" in Moscow

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Elrick

..
Threat . The photo is hard to see , over the signature of dating, and most of all to read : 901 ..

Or 961 edinichka where it disappeared with time <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Since I mentioned Spiridonov Moses Spiridonovicha here's an example
his work
http://artmus.culture21.ru/ppage.asp...te=AD&s_page=1

there by the way this site has more parachka Spiridonov , but I did not compare their work

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Alex_SG

Or 961 edinichka where it was lost over time

This writing is not worth it.



P.S.
On the other hand, you still had 904 messages and you like gibberish - Guru!

[Alex_SG]

Сообщение от Toinen

This writing is not worth it.


P.S. On the other hand, you still had 904 messages and you like gibberish - Guru !

What do you say ? Really? This is for you gurus measured by the number and the message Read More#, but for me it is secondary.
There was hard to see 901 or 961 , respectively, year or in 1901 or 1961 , and that this nonsense? Just do not write nonsense type for this is not important in 1901 or 1961 .

And that's what you have written, do not write worth it. Because , as I charge in pursuit of some sort of mythical points , and this is a pure lie ! If it is in your power can reset my counter on Communications and my thanks , though not so much , let your will add to it if you will warm the soul <! - ~ 1 ~ ->