Bukowski in Helsinki

[uriart]

I propose to discuss several lots from the auction Bukowski in Helsinki.
 
Four works by Aivazovsky and two works Savrasov.

For more information, readers can see on the site.

https://www.bukowskis.com/auctions/F165?category []=161 & page = 1

№ 291-Aivazovsky - oil on canvas
20h17sm, 1848

№ 292 Aivazovsky - hmm.
20h17 cm 1848

Добавлено через 5 минут
№ 301.Ayvazovsky - d.m.27h22 cm 1887

№ 302. Aivazovsky - d.m.28h21 cm attached to this work

COA: L.S.Gavrilenko, G.N.Goldovsky

Добавлено через 4 минуты
№ 296 - Klodt, Michael K. (1832-1902)

COWS the water.


Oil on canvas.
29.5 h44, 5.
Signature.


Are in private collections in Finland since the 1950's.

Добавлено через 2 минуты
№ 299 Aleksey Savrasov (1830-1897)

WINTER LANDSCAPE.


Signature.
-91.
Oil on canvas, 27x21 cm

[uriart]

№ 301.Ayvazovsky - d.m.27h22 cm 1887

№ 302. Aivazovsky - d.m.28h21 cm attached to this work

COA: L.S.Gavrilenko, G.N.Goldovsky

[uriart]

№ 296 - Klodt, Michael K. (1832-1902)

COWS the water.


Oil on canvas.
29.5 h44, 5.
Signature.


Are in private collections in Finland since the 1950's.

[uriart]

№ 299 Aleksey Savrasov (1830-1897)

WINTER LANDSCAPE.


Signature.
-91.
Oil on canvas, 27x21 cm

[uriart]

I'm not an expert on creativity and Aivazovsky Savrasov.
But from what I saw in my life something in memory postponed.
Highly questionable , in my opinion of Aivazovsky, lots number 291 and number 292.
And work Klodt, also I doubt its authenticity.
That the work itself, so also the signature is imposed or even new. As a splint on it smells ?
It is interesting to hear the views of other members of the forum .

[мистер-у]

Aivazovsky the conclusion G.Ya.Goldovskogo doubts about the authenticity does not cause the other three of the weak, but in any case they are not interesting.
M.Klodt not like it, especially the sky and cows probably falshaki .
A.K.Savrasova winter is not bad, but far from masterpieces , I personally do not like the signature , some grubaya.Rabota it requires further study.

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от uriart; 2357361"

It is doubtful , in my opinion works by Aivazovsky, lots number 291 and number 292 .

Despite the signature , date , availability craquelure and partial shedding of the paint layer , as well as expert opinion G.Ya.Goldovskogo to work "Misty Morning at the shore " Lot number 302, in any of the four works presented as paintings I.Ayvazovsky , authorship seascape , in my opinion, is not visible. It is unfortunate that the canvas showing on all sides , we were deprived of the possibility to look at the very expert opinion.

[Kaffsky]

Сообщение от Nicholas Levenkov

Despite the signature ...
I.Ayvazovsky, authorship, seascape, in my opinion, is not seen ....

uriart, at 100%agree with colleagues
>
 

Only Tone I would be more definitive ...
>
 
all You provide to support the work-falsehood Aki!
>

[uriart]

Nicholas Levenkov, I think that you can ask for an expert opinion, and it will be sent on request.

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от uriart; 2357361"

It is doubtful , in my opinion works by Aivazovsky, lots number 291 and number 292.
And work Klodt, also I doubt its authenticity.
That the work itself, so also the signature is imposed or even new. As a splint on it smells ?

Bring - we'll see . > sniff. > touch. We subject , so to speak , in-depth study of organoleptic ... (Some devotees of pure science is used and the method of " lick and a tail nanizhite " but dilettante - strongly objects !)