Продам: K.Kryzhitsky sale now

[Felizzia]

Selling picture K.Kryzhitskogo with posthumous exhibition of the artist in the original frame.
Size 15 * 22 cm , wood.
The back side of the right stamp with the text, confirming that the work was exhibited in a posthumous exhibition of KY Kryzhitsky in the halls of the IAH in 1911, the stamp bears the signature of the head of the artist exhibition NG Tsirigotti certified signature Clerk Ivanova . Has a red wax seal IAH

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Felizzia

Buy now K.Kryzhitskogo a posthumous exhibition of the artist in the original frame.

That's right in that same frame and exposed the landscape to a posthumous exhibition of Konstantin Yakovlevich Kryzhitsky " in the halls of IAH "?

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334191"

What a bitter irony, the same day on the forum appear Kryzhitsky and Brewery ( if you remember the first cause of suicide ), and both ... questionable, so to speak.

Kirill presented landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called. Already before the typical - typical nowhere. One of the numerous field studies, written in a fun thorns. ( Zacherene , Ramon and Gay Turn - favorite places KY ) and is present in the catalog , by the way >.
Yes, and " Brewery " is also certainly not "questionable ." Is certainly not Brewery .
Something like that.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334291"

Kirill presented landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called.

I called , I'm sorry , what wrote.
I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums, for example , that the landscape "Beach " in 1886 ( h /m, 45h64 ) here in Samara :

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334351"

I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums, for example , that the landscape "Beach " in 1886 ( h /m, 45h64 ) we in Samara :

It should be very sorry to see that studies K.Ya.Kryzhitskogo (and Voronezh , written in the estate of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna , and zacherenskie and Ternovskii ) in museum collections are hardly represented . But I saw them a couple of dozen at least. In good (mostly - St. Petersburg ), in private collections. I was lucky .
 Incidentally, in the present studies ( which is not bad even seen the photographs of this quality ) flawlessly everything itself marking and signature Clerk V. Ivanov , and the signature " insti dyval schego exhibition" Artists N.Tsirigoti et caetera , et caetera ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334481"

By the way, in the present studies ( which is not bad even seen the photographs of this quality ) flawlessly everything itself marking and signature Clerk V. Ivanov , and the signature " of director of the exhibition" Artist N.Tsirigoti et caetera , et caetera ...

 

On the back of the right stamp with the text, confirming that the work was exhibited in a posthumous exhibition of KY Kryzhitsky in the halls of the IAH in 1911, the stamp bears the signature of the head of the artist exhibition NG Tsirigotti on May 27, 1911 , signed, dated Clerk Ivanova . Bottom - red wax seal IAH. Top left is the number " 317 ." (Numbered 317 on display at the exhibition and published in the exhibition catalog essay "The Stones "). Top left sticker with a number and name : «№ 360 /Stones /Price :».

here . can be compared to
 Perhaps better photos and dispel my doubts, but now they are present, repeat .

[Сергей Мельников]

From notebooks kizhek Sergei Dovlatov (one of his friends): "I saw people who had seen Lenin."
I'm talking about expertise, and are you talking about?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Amateur , 2334551

However, this argument seems to me absolutely absurd. If something I do not know for sure - I prefer not to engage in conversation . And so as soon as I say anything definitely , so - to have a good reason. We are closing on this, if you do not mind. >

And I, in fact, do not argue , and tried to explain the author of the topic and the doubts once wrote :

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334351"

I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums ...

Apparently , I need an ophthalmologist prescribe new glasses with more diopters. >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Felizzia; 2334611"

I can try one more time to photograph the back side - but I only have the phone on hand

No, you are an expert who has seen these sketches Kryzhitsky few, have all said :

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334291"

This landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called.

And, if your photo in this backdrop look closely , the photo from the site of the auction Kabinet similarity is, of course , on your stamp with the text simply does cardboard merged with itself , he could barely discern , and Amateur- then such stamps on these sketches into a living saw and immediately recognized with confidence on 100%.

[Felizzia]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

That's right in that same frame and exposed the landscape to a posthumous exhibition of Konstantin Yakovlevich Kryzhitsky " in the halls of IAH "? >

What a bitter irony, the same day on the forum appear Kryzhitsky and Brewery ( if you remember the first cause of suicide ), and both ... questionable, so to speak.

In this frame the landscape hanging in my house about 100 years. Do not know which frame it was exposed , with or without frames. Apparently , you had to write that the frame - not a remake .

Sorry, did not realize to what the word "questionable "?